Bit last minute but here goes ......

Worky 18 - 19 cougars
last minute drop goal clinches it.



M.o.m. Barnett
att. 635.

Worky..12. Cougars 22.. MOM. Shick..

Could be right Alec - the big man has scored first!!

Thanks Cougartime.. proberly under the post.. could u keep us all posted and il buy u a pint down at CP..

6-6

10-6

18-6

18-6.. so workys winning?

Yes

19-6 -cmon a try and a point

25-18 final score - must have been a great effort in last 10 mins or so - great point - fantastic to get 4 points from two away trips to cumbria in 4 days.

THANKS EVERYBODY.for updates..thank god for bonus point.. well played the team... Cougaaars. yeeeahhh

Shame we couldn't get all the points but
as mentioned 4 points after two long
trips up to Cumbshire is better than
a poke in the eye with a shi**y stick.

WELL PLAYED COUGARS.

I switched the live score off at 25-6. That's actually very good to get a point from that position.

Fev have lost to swinton and York this year, but have also posted 50+ points in their last couple of games. How should March approach this game? My tactic would be old style in your face rough house stuff. Get in their faces, stop this shirt pulling nonsense.

Karl Pryce is an absolute beast, but I think we contained him after a while, forced an injury and made him leave the field. He was knackered in the second half and we almost won the game. Just get shickle to wind them all up before the game, you could hear Barry eaton doing it in the changing rooms. Screaming getting them wound up. March is too busy organising his delivery schedule for the white goods.

The turning point of the game was the injury to Hayley. They scored through the gap he would have been defending. To then lose Lawton was a step to far.

If they had not have had to go of i think we would have won it to be honest. As there was noting between the teams before that.

It was always going to be a about damage limitation from then on. When Buster went over to get a bonus point i went mad, but then for the ref to nearly cancel it was horrible.

Never been to Worky before. Its a cracking ground and the fans were great.

One thing they wont be short of is amateur refs. The main stand was bloody full of them

Agree with most of that guess who, I felt the banter in the ground went too far for my liking. I always used to like the visit to Derwent Park.

The error count must have been huge compared to Sunday, mostly due to the conditions I would have thought. Workington did keep possession more.

I hope Haley and Lawton are OK.

Banter was good lol, got to remember the old Scots at workington don't get out much.

There was a tweet by Chapalar saying that haley has dislocated his shoulder again, and that Lawtons injury is a suspected broken ankle.

If that is true then both are gone for the rest of the season.

And if Hayley has done his shoulder again, then i wonder if this could mean the end of his playing days.

I cant believe I am agreeing with the vast amount of what you say but hey hoe



However couldn't agree less on the ground and fans. I know all home fans get on the back of referees but they were extreme. They thought at every tackle we were infringing for one thing or another and for a twenty minute period the referee started agreeing with them.

As for the ground and grandstand the less said the better. However I will say something.With a track around it it has little atmosphere (no closeness). The ground was barely better than a ploughed field. The bar from inside the ground did not open their doors until 7.35

And yes as for the Buster try it shows what kind of game the Ref had when he is stood 4 yards away and disallows the try then goes to the touch judge 40 yards away from the action and reverses his decision. One that went our way

Have I missed something?

Elliott Miller was banned for 3 matches by the RFL's Disciplinary Committee on August 13th, which was subsequently reduced to 2 matches. However, he still played against us on Wednesday night.

Can anyone explain why this was permitted?

Although he might have submitted an appeal for a review, he was still going to be banned - check his disciplinary history, the Committee's comments and the RFL's guidelines.

Quote ="666"Have I missed something? Elliott Miller was banned for 3 matches by the RFL's Disciplinary Committee on August 13th, which was subsequently reduced to 2 matches. However, he still played against us on Wednesday night. Can anyone explain why this was permitted? Although he might have submitted an appeal for a review, he was still going to be banned - check his disciplinary history, the Committee's comments and the RFL's guidelines.'" Miller didn't play against you so nothing was permitted. www.newsandstar.co.uk/sport/town ... -1.1077741

Quote ="666"Have I missed something? Elliott Miller was banned for 3 matches by the RFL's Disciplinary Committee on August 13th, which was subsequently reduced to 2 matches. However, he still played against us on Wednesday night. Can anyone explain why this was permitted? Although he might have submitted an appeal for a review, he was still going to be banned - check his disciplinary history, the Committee's comments and the RFL's guidelines.'" Miller didn't play against you so nothing was permitted. www.newsandstar.co.uk/sport/town ... -1.1077741

Sky must have got the teams wrong then.

Which club supplied the information?