Quote ="Ndamukong"Yeah because the Rams and Stacy faced D's afraid of the pass with Clemens out there
The pair were on 4.1 YPC going into week 17. Not seen any stats since. You know the Bears rush D was horrific all year and essentially a gimme 150 for opposing RBs?
I just don't buy it. Guy has similar stats to a 5th rounder who played on a worse team against better teams (throughout the course of the season).
Don't get how you place Lacy over Allen or even Mike Glennon who played pretty well given the circumstances he got the job. Both positions far harder to enter the league in than at running back. Then again you've shown yourself to be more than a little blinkered when it comes to the Packers.
Cordarrelle Patterson is great but if you can be OROY off the back of less than 500 receiving yards and 150 rushing yards then the worlds gone mad.'"
To be honest i didn't realise Keenan Allen had so many yards and Patterson had so few. i know he did a lot of damage in the return game but i thought they introduced him more in the offence - maybe just seemed like it when i saw them play. Flip Allen and Patterson around.
We obviously have a different view on what "similar" means. 300 more (total) yards and 3 more TD's is not similar. Not to mention the stats i mentioned earlier about leading the league since week 5 and leading the league in yards after contact. He is top 10 in every meaningful category for his position as a rookie. That is brilliant. Bell, Bernard and Stacy all look like very good RB's from this class. It just so happens that they haven't been able to match Lacy's output this season. Also Packers and Rams strength of schedule was remarkable similar based on last years results.
Given your love for yards per attempt i'm sure you'd agree that Kenny Stills should actually be RoY. After all he was drafted later than Keenan Allen and has a higher yards per catch than him? That's how you are judging RB's so i assume it's the same for WR's....only fair?