I'm not saying you're wrong, I'd just like to see these threads we're some fans are conceding the league already to Wolves and the Maguire bashing one. As for this thread, it's just silly.

no, nor do I think that of any player. Do you think that of any player?

I agree with this..... OP is just making himself/herself look silly... Its a squad game...

"Wire fans getting carried away (just a bit)..................."

"Is Madge focussed on Wigan"

Not all of the posters on those threads are coming out with nonsense, but there is some cringemaking stuff on there.

We are Wigan fans. Our team are the champions.

We should fear no-one, especially not a team like Dire, with a proven track record of flattering to deceive. We should back our own players and coach unless we are given a reason to do otherwise.

We have the two best players in SL - Paaaaaaaaaaaat (how we missed the presence of the great man in the early part of this season) and Sam. Let's leave the opposition - whoever they may be - to worry about those two, two of the greatest RL players in the SL era.

People seem to be in some sort of ridiculous panic about the Wolfs' pack, frankly it's embarrassing to see from Wigan fans. This isn't the mid-noughties side. We have a very strong pack which may be in a flat spot of form, but it's a long season and there are no prizes for peaking in May.

When you think that we have Hock and Fielden to come back into the side, this makes it even more ridiculous. What a massive boost that will be as we approach the business end of the season. The bottom line is that our pack is second to none, including Wire's. We should leave the worrying to the opposition and concentrate on delivering the potential of the best squad in SL.

Hansen's contribution is replaceable, in his absence we cam be just as strong as we have players who can do what he can do. However there are several players which offer something more unique to the team.
For example.
Pat Richards-best winger at the club. His conversations can win a game. This has been proven.
Sam Tomkins-offers so much strike in attack, make so many meters and is SL deadly, we have no one like him in the team.

Was H missed? No. Cos others can do what he can do, he's a solid yet average SL player. Many many better SRs in SL.
I have nothing against H. But I do have something against the attitude and behaviour of several posters. Hence the whole purpose of this thread.

Goal kicking (error)

To quote Deano G "We should leave the worrying to the opposition and concentrate on delivering the potential of the best squad in SL" Thats so true in sport, nothing worse that seeing one player is not availiable, just to see another one step up to take his place of similar ability. THAT'S why HH is important, not as an individual, but as a member of a squad.

That shot he took off morley 9/10 players would have dropped that ball

did we lose games when Richards was out due to goal kicking? Did we win games without sam? Your argument isnt valid.

The arguement is only valid if you know the results IF HH had played. But we don't.

Hansen is replaceable. And wasn't missed we did lose games due to kicking (Richards) and Sam clearly offers something which others dont.

Out of interest where in Wigan do you come from and how old are you?

Nope. The results and performance over a number of games reflect if the player was missed.
It's very black and white. Did we miss him? No. How can I say that? Cos we haven't lost in his absence.

You're wasting your breath last son, did you not know, you are not allowed to have a different opinion to anybody else on this forum, if you dont agree with the "clique" you are just wasting your time!

I aint in any clique and if i agreed with him i would say but this thread is stupid

He is saying that the results are down to 1 player which is not true

I'd like to take this opportunity to thank 'Last Son of Wigan' for cheering me up when I'm in work. Absolutely cracking thread that has to be a contender for thread of the year. Brilliant.

I'll just carry on. Anyone with even half a brain can see there are many posters on here who are inbreds. Love to pick and do what they can to have a pop at someone's opinion.
Sad thing is many in here don't even get it. They think I'm having some massive pop at Hansen when in truth I'm pointing out a clear fact about the teams performances in his absence.
I only even bothered after the I took for it when mentioning it.

It's a pity our club is followed by so many retards. It's why other clubs and places in the UK think Wigan is full of yocals.

I never said the results are down to one player. I said Hansen wasn't missed. FFS!
Go and get some sugar to pour down your windows, itll make them taste better for you.

Love the pic, what are you 12?

Why is the thread stupid?? I thought the idea of a forum was for people to discuss matters and give their opinions?? there was a thread recently about wether hansen would be missed, Last son of Wigan got slaughtered for having the opinion that he would not be missed as we have other SR forwards that could step up and do a good job in his absence.

Now several weeks later having won every game since he has been out, Last Son of Wigan is now asking the question has he been missed??? The answer is no, he has not. I am a fan of Hansen myself and do believe he has a part in the squad but given our form over the last few weeks he simply has not been missed.

DAMN... OP is quite right...!!!!! We should sell HH and buy an expensive Aussie, causing us to be weaker in other areas. HH is non quota, and would wlk into anyother side in SL

Insults now great

Grow up if you want a discuss the topic stay on it

Oh my god there's a break through. Someone can actually understand the point.

Even a 12-year-old would have more RL sense than you mate going off this thread.

Go on then, show us where anybody has suggested selling HH and replacing him with an Aussie???? The whole argument was that we have a young SR from WIGAN that can do just as good a job as HH