It causes problems for RLFans thats all, now if you'd suggested that people type "Lee Smith 3 Chicken Wings" into YouTube that would be fine and still will be when someone comes along to moderate this thread



Not that its any of my business

Done. Just for you.

Search Blatant Obsructions on Pat Richards whilst you're at it. The first one is horrendous, yet the ref and linesman missed it

That youtube profile is quite funny, all things the ref didn't spot against Wigan.

It had to be in the game plan didn't it? "Stop Pat Richards contesting the high ball at all costs." Brian McDermott must know his players simply cannot compete with the champions.

Leeds have more Chicken Wings than Hooters in Nottingham on a monday!

(All you can eat wings for £7. Lovely

)

Burrow has been banned for 1 match for his "tackle" on Hoffman. Just watched it again, and it's a pathetic attempt. Pretty much an arm bar wrestling move thing. Shameful, Leeds.

Not as bad as baileys or those by smith though that's the thing haha

Didn't realise Burrow had been banned, I must have missed that when I read the disciplinary as I thought only Coley had received any action against him. Odd that Burrow was banned for that and Smith got away with what he did. Just goes to show what a poor and inconsistent job the disciplinary panel are doing. One thing is for sure though, Leeds set out to target Hoffman's joints and Pat on the high ball.

any news on coley yet?

I don't know but he certainly deserves a one game ban. Stupid play from him and could cost us on Wednesday, especially with Prescott missing.

Nothing on the RFL site yet, but Cooper has a one game ban for a similar offence.

1 match ban for Coley apparently

ANG ON A MINUTE...

Burrow has been charged for law 15.1, which is listed in his disciplinary as a Grade B offence 1-2 match ban...

Lima was charged for law 15.1 against saints, which is listed in his as a Grade C ofence, 2-3 match ban...


consistency?????

Grade C carries a higher penalty than Grade B. Unless I've completely misunderstood your post.

yep, the point is, same law, same offence, different grade...

you couldn't make it up..... oh wait, you did......fine plus a warning!

I didnt, [urlhttp://viewtopic.php?f=21&t=499839[/url

I should have put that I had seen it on the Warrington site, that in itself would explain everything.

you obviously didn't read the thread properly though did you? one poster said 1 match ban "trust me" another poster then poo poo'd this and posted the real outcome.
i however feel your just grasping at straws after being found out, but hey what do i know, i'm just a wire fan (that explains everything in the world of lippy

)

Leeds did quite a few 'chicken wing' tackles the other night and it wasn't just Smith. It was obvious it was a deliberate tactic.

You offering advice on moderation and legalities? That's a laugh.

Still bitter eh ?

I'm not the one who banned someone for being called (incorrectly and illegally) a racist.

You're the bitter one, especially after I embarrassed you so thoroughly.

No apology forthcoming from you, or the plank who said McGuire "NEVER defends on the wing"... Especially as several teams since then have exploited his weak wing defence to cost you matches. Another reason for you to be bitter.

19-0 now?

And herein is the reason no-one would miss Sub-standard. This guy's supposed to set an example.