Unless Sia Soliola makes a diving ankle tap as he goes through.

You mean like the one he made on Brett (not renowned for his pace) Finch in the first few minutes of the game at the Etihad?

Have a read at some of the compelling arguments why we shouldn't sign Chase on the 'Rangi Chase for £350,000' thread.

Nah, it was a bit different to that one!

So, yes or no ?....

Tomkins will upstage Chase and he wont want that, in a way henry paul had that streak in him but he mellowed with age. This is a tough 50/50 call isnt it? Part of me really doesnt want Warrington to sign him. But you cant sign a player just because another team wants him, not unless your chelsea or man city....

Not exactly. The trick Smith (or whoever) will need to learn is which of the players to pass to (or to go himself). It's those players that create the gaps, but where Brett (and to a lesser extent Tommy) excels is in selecting who is a dummy runner and who is the threat, depending on how the defence is shaping. They dont so much create the gaps as exploit them better than most.

Tommys dummy half skills are also excellent and that relieves the pressure on many occasion. Tommy has big boots to fill

Exactly and that is exactly what we need from one of our halfs. A Smith/Chase partnership will be a good balance imo.

I agree. Its 'almost' like an Edwards and Gregory* partnership. A steady player and a maverick.

*I'm not for one minute suggesting that Edwards/Smith and Gregory/Chase on on the same page regarding quality.

Do you not find it strange that these days you and others have to quantify your statements like your last one.

Surly the majority of people on here realise your point and know Edwards and Greg are the level above Smith and Chase right?

It's Veivers.....

It's the Internet. You get jumped on for spelling there as their. All statements have to be quantified.