Dont worry about that, Brough's not been great for us this season, bit hit and miss, missing the ones you expect to get and banging them over from the touchline.

Who is missing?

Was wondering why the hell Wigan were 2/1 in the betting

Tomkins x 2
Richards
Gleeson
Deacon
Fielden

S Tomkins, J Tomkins, Finch, Richards, Deacon, Fielden, O'Carroll, Gleeson and Hock ( If you can count Gleeson and Hock that is ).

Oh typical Wigan fan, moaning about your injuries.........

Still can win this with the players you have.

Just been reading the preview.



Pretty sure we just won without.

Mona's
Woof Mona's
King
Hodgson
Morley

Think you will win tonight if sticking to the game plan.

You can deffo add Gleeson to the list..but not Hock and O'Carroll.

You CAN add O'Carroll, as if he was fit he would be playing. Hock you can't because he wouldn't be playing either way.

I suppose.

but it seems hes been out longer than Hocks ban.

Nah. Prescott and Mossop in front of him for mine.

But he'd be in contention for a place, is probably more what I was aiming at. He's still an injured Wigan player.

THAT was an awesome display



Commitment. Passion. Belief in each other. Great stuff.

The defensive display was brutal from the 1st minute to the 80th.

I can see your point but there is currently a HUGE difference between a trip to Hudds and a trip to Wakey, we both know that. The performance tonight speaks for itself. I don't think any other team would have beaten Hudds tonight with 8-9 players out.

Wakey went to Hull and won with some ease tonight.

Lets face it its 7 players O'Carroll wouldn't play and Hock hasnt been a Wigan player since his white line days.

And only three subs in rotation, Mellor didnt get any game time.

Only because we softened them up last week. That was their cup final, and they couldn't back it up the following game.

bloody hell, you dont half spout some turd. Wakey have gone and had a great win and you put it down to yourselves... that's a bit self obsessed even for wigan.

Nowt like a bit of truth.

*chomp*

Quote ="Wire_85"Still can win this with the players you have. Just been reading the preview. Pretty sure we just won without.posting.php?mode=quote&f=28&p=15947734 Mona's Woof Mona's King Hodgson Morley Think you will win tonight if sticking to the game plan.'" Give over man you can't compare Wakefield to playing top of the table (as we did last night!)

Quote ="Wire_85"Still can win this with the players you have. Just been reading the preview. Pretty sure we just won without.posting.php?mode=quote&f=28&p=15947734 Mona's Woof Mona's King Hodgson Morley Think you will win tonight if sticking to the game plan.'" Give over man you can't compare Wakefield to playing top of the table (as we did last night!)

fair smigin of egg on your mush stnickle.

Am comparing the fact we can go away and still be winning "with absences like that"

Oh and I missed LAnderson off the list so it was 6 players which were starters of our 13.

We're not questioning that, the gripe was with your seemingly attempting to liken winning at Wakefield (admittedly with absences), and winning away to Huddersfield with absences.

If we're both honest, you'd expect Wigan and Wire to win at Wakefield with the injuries we've had given their recent troubles.

Huddersfield is a completely different scenario.

I wasn't my post was before your win against Hudds.

Maybe I have taken it out of context and Bilko mean't just against Hudds and not other games.