i know like i say, its an option, for a different approach,

A worse approach

1 Sam Tomkins
2 Tom Briscoe
3 Kris Welham
4 Chris Bridge
5 Ryan Hall
6 Gareth Widdop
7 Jonathan Lomax
8 James Graham
9 James Roby
10 Andy Lynch
11 Jamie Jones Buchanan
12 Gareth Ellis
13 Sean O Loughlin

14 Eorl Crabtree
15 Jon Wilkin
16 Joe Westerman
17 Leroy Cudjoe
18 Danny Houghton

yup, cos i'm really trying to break up a winning formula

me you lot will bicker over anything.

I'd definately consider Bridge for a bench spot, I think with Roby being able to do 80 minutes I'd have Bridge or Lomax there to cover across the backline.

Unfortunately I think Robinson will be there though.

I think Bridge should play in the centres. But you must be joking if you think hes a better option than Lockers as a loose forward!

Different option

Wellens is a different option to Sam at FB, doesnt mean I think it should happen. We could play that knight thing with a bin on it's head instead of Roby, that's a different option.

Say Lockers gets injured during a game then what?

Do you understand what a debate is or do i have to call you silly names and make fun of you?

Suggesting Warrington players to play in positions where there are other players who are better than them then having a hissy fit when this is pointed out isnt a debate.

What did you think of Bridges performances at Loose Forward this year?

He's only played there 3 times this year. That definitely qualifies him for playing 13 Internationally doesn't it.

I think hes a good player and I've always rated him, but as a centre. He's big and good in defence which is what we need against the aussies and kiwis, plus the fact Reed has committed means there's no need to have Shenton for them to run over!

I think a backline of:

Sam
Charnley
Reed
Bridge
Briscoe

Widdop
Brough

is onw of the best we have had for quite a while! Young as well

Charnley should be nowhere near England yet. Defence is still woeful.

Ryan Hall and I'd probably even argue Ben Jones Bishop should be ahead of him. And thats without mentioning any of the Hudds boys.

Sam is a 6 surely, i mean he played 6 before he was switched to 1, therefore he's a 6 right?

Again i'll ask what did you think of his 'THREE' performances at 13? i'll open it up to you too Wigg'n.

I think Charnley and Reed is a mouthwatering prospect and should be tried out, could be a centre/wing partnership for many years. Fair enough he has parts of his game to work on but his defence certainly isnt woeful. I wouldnt swap him for either Hall or BJB at Wigan.

still tugging at that?

just stop, bridge is not an option at 13 for england just because he's played a few times there in a game against salford where you've scored over 50 points.

The fact is no one is saying replace SOL, they are saying 'another option', the other fact his non of you guys have actually seen him play there but KNOW he's rubbish there ??

Sometimes completely by accident a player is moved in to a position to cover injuries and all of a sudden you realise "Sh*t why has he never played that position before"?

Bridge can tackle, he his very strong and can brush players off and burst tackles for fun, he's also deceptively quick.

I'm not having a hissy fit, I'm not defending a Wire corner, i just want to talk rugby, i think Lockers is the best 13 in SL i also personally believe he's the best player in your team, i said this months ago and was ripped to pieces by all these 'knowledgeable' wigan fans, then a few weeks later the 'greatest' manager in SL said the same thing and i watched the thread in which you all kissed his backside and agreed with him ?? A Wire fan can't say it and im wrong yet Madge says it and "yeah he's right Lockers is brilliant"

I'd have BJB in a flash. That lads something special, even more so than Charnley in my opinion, who I also rate highly.

If this was American football, i'd have Charnley in the Attacking squad all day long but god his defence his poor.

The Oz/Kiwi machine will target his wing all day long if he plays for England.

www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Not having a go or anything as it's all your opinions but Peacock isn't as bad as what anyones making him out to be. Still averaging well over 100m per game and improving every game. As for the question earlier about whan he last had a good game... Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties Peacock: 158 - 21 (7.52) - 37 - 0 (100%) - 0 – 1 This was 4 days ago against top 4 team Huddersfield.

www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Not having a go or anything as it's all your opinions but Peacock isn't as bad as what anyones making him out to be. Still averaging well over 100m per game and improving every game. As for the question earlier about whan he last had a good game... Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties Peacock: 158 - 21 (7.52) - 37 - 0 (100%) - 0 – 1 This was 4 days ago against top 4 team Huddersfield.

Yeah he's different class. The only way charnley will play before bjb, hall and Briscoe is through injury.

We now have a group of centres in bridge, reed, shenton and watkins who are all extremely competent, add in atkins too who although has been pathetic at the W/cup has certainly turned a corner. Then there is a choice of 3 to 4 wingers who can also do a job.

It's been a long time coming but things are looking up.

Those stats are better than when he was at his best. If he keeps up a similar workload through the play offs then he'll have certainly earned his place in the 4 nations.

That's how it should be. It's a mistake picking players on past glories.