My crystal ball tells me we would have won every game 80-0 with H in the team. So yes, we have missed him

I'd still like you to answer this please, Last Son of Wigan.

which ones?

No answer to this either...

All clearly in retaliation.

It has nothing to do with the OP.

Don't you watch the games?

For what reason?

i mentioned roberts incase you was to bring him up because hes actually the only person who has done anything near what sam does in that posistion but like i said it was for like 8 games. And even then i think people went alittle over the top because sam has done what roberts did and more and yet still gets the odd bit of abuse off people on here for not passing enough! Deacon didnt have any troubles kicking at bradford and if given the job again im sure he would get back to that level! as good as pat richards is i just cant accept a winger being the most important player in our team because if we was to have an odd day you would probably not even notice pat richards!

Keep it coming, seriously. It's laughable. people in here are so thick they don't even understand the opening post (bar one or two).

And because of this opinion I am now into my 9th page of abuse. Is there any wonder why I fought back with names? No.

Now I have people twisting and turning proposing different questions at me trying to back me into a corner, it really is bizarre to see how people react to an opening post.

Keep it coming folks.

Seriously deluded.

Keyboard Warrior MattyB.

Lets do a very simple test of your intelligence.

Question 1: What was the initial post about?

Question 2: What was the purpose of the post?

But,

You made a statement which others disagree with.

You later said you wanted to free up "Wigan based talent", which HH is.

You have been given numerous reasons why people do not agree with you.

You have responded to peoples views with insults and rants.

You have taken one slant on an arguement to justify yourself and others have disagreed.

You have choosen to ignore all the views of others, even if they can see the merit of your arguement, But have given you reasons why they don't agree with you. If you can't take people disagreeing with you, maybe you should refrain from opening a thread.

1. We all know what it was about.

"Look at me, Look at me". "I was right from a few weeks ago".

2. To attempt to make everyone who disagree with your 'opinion' look foolish.


I'd say both attempts crashed and burned looking over the last 9 pages.

Answer to Q1..... For you to justify your arguement.

Answer to Q2......See above.

Looks like we are both stupid MattyB

The Wigan based talent was a totally separate issue. It was an argument I was all for.
This thread is about was Hansen missed, so the Wigan based talent has nothing to do with it.
People can disagree with me, thats fair enough, shame that the majority (like yourself) don't even understand the OP.
I have used insults in retaliation to the many insults I have received first.
I have argued a point, which I still agree with, you don't even probably understand the OP.

Keep it coming.

So what was my intial point? Please show you know what the entire thread is about, because as it stands you look a little silly arguing for the sake of it.
I don't mind disagreement, I do mind abuse which I then have to retaliate against.

Come on MattyB, you can do it!

I'm off to clean behind my fridge....

[uTHE GLORIOUS OP[/u

Can I give you a hand?

Because I thought the post was a perfectly valid question related to the topic of whether or not HH was missed. I simply asked the question to gain a better understanding of your opinion (which you are perfectly entitled to, although I disagree with it) by asking you to clarify a point you made.

Namely this bit:

I was just wondering who you had in mind?

back to the original question, no we havent missed hansen as of yet but at the moment when all fit he would still be in the 17 with out question. With hock and fielden back then i dont know. Think it will be a 50/50 one. I personally would leave him out as i prefer both mossop and farrell and then hock and fielden will come in for hansen and lima. Thats just my opinion though! I actually dont think mcguire will though.

Whatever floats your boat. If you don't understand something just ask. As the OP poster I am always willing to justify my point, no one has to agree with it. But I will discuss it.

PS I only name call when attacked.

Quote ="Lucky XIII"Because I thought the post was a perfectly valid question related to the topic of whether or not HH was missed. I simply asked the question to gain a better understanding of your opinion (which you are perfectly entitled to, although I disagree with it) by asking you to clarify a point you made. Namely this bit: I was just wondering who you had in mind?'" Sure www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Look at his direct replacement.

Quote ="Lucky XIII"Because I thought the post was a perfectly valid question related to the topic of whether or not HH was missed. I simply asked the question to gain a better understanding of your opinion (which you are perfectly entitled to, although I disagree with it) by asking you to clarify a point you made. Namely this bit: I was just wondering who you had in mind?'" Sure www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Look at his direct replacement.

Quote ="Last Son of Wigan"Sure www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Look at his direct replacement.'" Except that Liam Farrell wasn't Hansen's direct replacement. They are both fully fledged first-team players in their own right. I'd call neither a squad player. Hansen and Farrell were both in the squad when HH was ruled out. His direct replacement (i.e. the player who came into the 17 the week after to replace him) was Chris Tuson. So I urge you to have a look at his direct replacement: www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011

Quote ="Last Son of Wigan"Sure www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Look at his direct replacement.'" Except that Liam Farrell wasn't Hansen's direct replacement. They are both fully fledged first-team players in their own right. I'd call neither a squad player. Hansen and Farrell were both in the squad when HH was ruled out. His direct replacement (i.e. the player who came into the 17 the week after to replace him) was Chris Tuson. So I urge you to have a look at his direct replacement: www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011