Can anyone remind me why we let this lot leave?

cos when they were at Wigan they werent good enough...

Brown - No confidence
Robinson - Disciplinary reasons
Hodgson - Dodgy
Wild - Could have stayed, but we have better back rowers coming through.

Because more imports were needed, and Wigan could not afford them otherwise.

you lost all credibility when you said Hodgson!!







the only one of those players who may get in the team now would be brown....the players we have a far better!

I still wouldn't have any of them back.

brown wouldn't.

the only one i'd have out of the lot would be Wild, great 2nd rower.

Huddersfield are proof of what a very good coach can do with a team, man for man there isn't many that you'd have in a super league dream team or anything, but he's got them playing extremely well as a team, so well drilled defensively.

Huddersfield have been a pretty solid outfit for a few years now; people are often still distracted by their seasons welded to the foot of the table.

I'd have Wild back.

I'd only have Wild back, although Brown did have a good game today.

agreed. Once they were dumped by Wigan it was the wake up call these guys needed. Todays result is more to do with the coach Brown. He is fantastic.

A good post until your last statement about a 'great style of play'.

They are actually quite dull to watch....very structured, very disciplined, little flair....(saying that the first try of the second half was a fantastic pre-set move...

).

It is because of this dullness that they are acheving so much success...A similar thing appears to be happening with my side, Warrington....For years we had Paul Cullen attempting to turn us into the Kevin Keegan-era Newcastle Utd of Super League...A 'You score 40, we'll score 41' mentality...Eventually, this naiveity got found and Cullen got sent on his way to his rightful home (The National League).

Now we have finally found a coach who realises the importance of discipline and structure, and with it results have improved, even if entertainment is sometimes lacking on what we were used to.

Just remember back to your successful sides of the late 80's, early 90's and you will realise that, yes you did have some great individuals, but importantly they played to a well thought out plan from some great coches of that era.

I thought all of Hudds tries were great especially the first, it was perfection and the last one was a moment of brilliance from Hodgson and some poor defense from Graham.

Your right in saying it's not the greatest to watch in entertainment value, however I stand by my statement "it's a great style of play to win games" because it is, there in 3rd place and have recently been racking up some big scores, plus that style of play completely nullified saints. Yes it may not be highly riveting stuff to watch, but god it's effective.