Quote ="sergeant pepper"As good as he is he's not as good as Sam.
I'm sure the good Dr has paid a small fortune for him meaning they've technically part financed the Tomkins deal for the warriors. Its a win for the NZ warriors and it's good for Salford as he's quality.
That's two teams who got young exciting fullbacks and we got cash in the bank.
Serious question what would we have preferred? Money or Locke?'"
If the option was open to take Locke back then? Locke.
Money doesn't score tries and we would not be looking to play Hampshire out of position at 1 either had we got Locke back then.
That boat has sailed though so now it depends on what happens when Bowen leaves.
If whoever plays FB for us then isn't as good as Locke (or Sam) then the fact two clubs have top class players at full back and we have a pile of cash is no use.
If our FB is up there with them, then no problem.