Sam (our wounderful youth) needs to be at 6 end off.
he did nothing wrong at full back tonght, but Lockers isn't a 6 as stated.

Definitely an error in judgement from MM. That said I think we could have muddled through and won if it weren't for two or three stupid penalties, but yeah, he needs to pick his team with a little more foresight in future.

You bugger, was just gonna post exactly the same thing.



Was worth his weight in gold that guy, one of my all time favourite players.

Considering how much ball Goulding's wing saw last night; why not move Goulding onto Carmont's wing, Pat to Fullback and then Amos out to Gleeson's wing? Gleeson is good enough to carry Amos in defensive if he has too and Goulding has enough pace to be able to work off the space George creates. Pat could then chime into the line between them in attack, as well as being bigger and stronger in defense. Sam can then stay where he belongs - at number 6!

Phelps is a terrible defensive full back, never gets near the man. I agree that if Phelps is in better form than Roberts in the U20s then bring him in, but it has to be at stand off for my money. I'd go:

FB 6 Sam
RW 24 Goulding
RC 3 Gleeson
LC 4 Carmont
LW 5 Richards
SO 1 Phelps
SH 7 Leuluai
P 8 Fielden
H 9 Riddell
P 29 Tuson/31 Davies if Joel suspended
SR 11 Hansen
SR 25 Farrell
LF 13 O'Loughlin

S 10 Coley
S 12 Joel/29 Tuson if Joel suspended
S 15 McIllorum
S 17 Paleaaesina

I said Prescott was poor v Bradford when most said he was one of the men of the match and people agree he was poor v Leeds. Are O'Carroll and Bailey out for the season? Coley benched not because he's poor, just because I don't think we have enough impact off the bench at the minute

NO no no never put Joel in the centre again he's a second rower we've enough cover with Marsh and Charnley