With Gleeson coming in and Mathers leaving does that mean that Pat Richards will revert to full back?

I think a sense check is in order here.

I don't think Richards is a great full back. I think he is a solid full back, and the best option we have at the moment, but that is it.


Very rare that he beats the first man when running the ball back. His defence is good, without being outstanding.

Tbh I think many on here vastly overrate his ability. Take away his kicking (which btw I think merits his selection), and he is a solid enough player without being a star.

disagree completely....richards is our best player and first name on the teamsheet IMO. Best FB we've had since radlinski by a country mile

Your one to talk as well!

The whole Gareth Hock rant

These are the key words here!

Who is actually on that list?

mathers and ashton, not hard is it



andy is a tit