Sorry I forgot the ref cannot be questioned, only blindly defended to the point of absurdity.

As stated before N B does it as a windup the more you bite the more he quotes rubbish.

Nah hes just not as good at the rules as he thinks he is and makes himself look stoopid by snipping at the team and cheering the refs

Watching the offending tackle on youtube, even anyone new to the game could see that he rolled himself and played for the penalty.
1. Bird should be sanctioned by the diciplinary committe for behaviour detremental to the spirit of the sport
2. He should be laughed at as a diving nancy by all other players.....
3. He is a grub..... Sooner he slopes off back down under the better
4. Both officials got it wrong on the day but hell will freeze over before NB admits he and they were wromg

Hey who’s this nb guy ?

Mr xfactor been doing it years. Boys at titans will tell you

Was a tough boy years ago. .... lighter dipper now

Do you offer a translation service?

NB is keeping quiet. Perhaps he has been owned ?

Sorry mate. Aussie

As everyone says bird dived, he couldnt have dived without the leg lift, ergo, penalty.fact is it was a yellow, its chip wrapping now so irrelevant.
I do support players when they Play within but I will not blindly supporyplayers when they offend!
I will acknowledge when we are offside, I will acknowledge when we offend in the tackle, that does not make me less of a fan

Still waiting for you to show where the laws state that lifting a leg is a penalty.

Yes it's history now but so is any credibility you had, you have called a player stupid and another players defence in a game shocking yet you call yourself a fan, quite ironic given the stupidity of some posts in the shocking defence of the ref.

Traffic I agree with every word you have written above

NB if it is history and yesterdays chip paper why raise the subject again. Is it because the referees greatest fan is trying to justify the indefensibile

You wont get it because it doesnt exist.... But like trump, NB believes repeating a lie will eventually make it a truth

Both valid points, still can't work out if the posts are a wind up or delusional. Whatever they are they've been shown as a waste of time and effort reading them, based on very little, if any fact.

Mmmmmm

Lets work on the reasonable premise that the majority of the body's mass is above the thigh and as such the body's centre of gravity is somewhere in the upper body.

Lets also assume that Newton got it right about resultant forces - unless you want to contest that NB.

It doesn't take a huge leap of understanding to appreciate that using whatever contact Brid had with the tackler as a small amount of force, and this combined with his overt lunge and roll, then he could indeed cheat the referee.

This is exactly what happened.

Don't be so silly, the ref can clearly overule Newton's laws, they are paid officials after all.