Am now officially impressed in one thread gf managed to get loving in 7 times. Directly insulting one poster twice by calling him an idiot and suggested he should go away and copulate, icing on the cake apparently their are several self abusers on here, has to be a record?

Records are meant to be broken!

another pleasant effect of my continued refusal to toe the party line and accept what has been done to the club



The rest of your post is just another whine to the moderators. As has been pointed out before, i took a voluntary break mid season and the missing stayed missing.......there really is little point in blaming me when the FACTS say otherwise.

Back on thread.as Milf has said, whatever the circumstances, we are the hive in 2015 so pay up your subs and look forward to seeing some wins........

Why are people who are bored of this topic still posting on it ?

Given the moral indignation displayed by perry and michael, it would seem that they want the moderators to act and will keep bleating about my use of colourful language until i am given a warning. I find it ing hilarious.

Mate if you used the same approach at a game you would most likely be asked to leave the stadium and possibly with a bloody nose if you were asdirectly insulting as you choose to be on here. Before you start ranting and raving no its in no way a threat just how things are.
It's funny though you tend to find its the uneducated idiots that resort to foul language and insults during a debate.

Irony alert.......

By the way....dont make threats and then say they aren't threats....it makes you look more of a softcock than you already do.....

As somebody who often flashes the "I've been personally insulted so therefore........" card, an irony alert is most welcome.

Off topic however, if you posting keeps Jay away then perhaps there is a god, reminds me of the joke about how to confuse a Daily Mail reader........

Please explain the irony comment! As I said not a threat just giving you advice on things I have seen when folk use that language and act that way in public!
I do find it interesting that I made a clear statement, but you chose to ignore that bit, maybe a lesson in communication, I wrote exactly what I meant to avoid ambiguity. I made a positive statement.
So if you start a thread , "homeless in 2015" that is how we will read it! Had you put "homeless in 2015?" Then it becomes a question not a statement.
nice to see you managed to squeeze in another personal insult, well done

Micky, you will never win a war of words with GF so you might as well give it a rest.

Agree that Micky could give it a rest. Reason being that Micky has won it already, many times.

Won what


there was a prize? Nobody ing told me.......did Hughes put it up or was it "donated" by blake solly and the rfl to sweeten the thread?

Nobody's won anything......the 2015 deal was renegotiated and the other 300+ posts are just whining about me.

This thread died somewhere before page 29. And you have demonstrated yourself as a dancer in the dark.

....at a silent disco?

OK......try re-reading the quote from your post below first. If you still can't see it, then try to concentrate on the words in Bold.....you are essentially insulting me.......straight after you explain that in your opinion, it is usually uneducated idiots who use insults in a debate.......hello Mr Kettle.....have you met Mr Pot?

When you were on the bulls board being a scamp I don't think I clocked you being a london follower. It's nice to know where to find you though.

You wouldn't like to adopt him, would you

We do run a reciprocal respite care service. If you'd like to choose a nutter to take from our board I'll push the paperwork through.

Provided said nutter doesn't drool, reside in the shaky isles, pretend to be in marketing, or generally display narcissistic qualities, we will take him.

We'll pass thanks knowing our luck we'd end up with Gledhill...

After successive posts from Homer and Big G, who's coming next?
Rupe1? Loudmouth? ........ - life in the lower reaches may not be so bad after all.

The new way to confuse a Daily Mail reader is to have a Tory and a UKIP candidate up against each other

Presumably not in a Brooks Newmark, up against each other, way.

Gutters, you chose to wear the cap. If you read the actual words in my post did I ever use the word "you", therefore no actually I did not insult you directly, you chose to apply it to yourself.
no irony at all

Scamp! I've been called worse......