henderson on the super league show said walmsley lost the ball... so a knock on but we know what happened to level the scores

Well if Henderson said it it must be true!?

The walmsley penalty was as soft as the savelio penalty that led to Leeds first try against us last week. For me, both were soft and not really worth calling up - but they were.

If we really want to argue about reffing decisions, I'd suggest there was far more evidence to suggest makinson scored vs Salford (that was ruled out) than there was for lunts first try (that was given)

Lunts first try wasn't given it was disallowed for a non existent knock on!! sorry but lets get the facts right, you must of missed that one

you're correct he didnt - he was seen as he arrived. He was in his car which he then parked in the odeon carpark (naughty). He then got someone else to collect and drive his car away later..... wonder why??

No, the first no try, where Lunt knocks on trying to put the ball down on lomax's leg was a correct decision. As soon as the ball hit lomaxs leg, it was a knock on (There are even wiganers on the saints board admitting it was the correct decision, usually we say black they say white!)

The Lunt try, which was given on the evidence of a saints hand being on the ball (which smith mistook for lunts left arm - from the far right corner, funny how no ones complaining that that camera angle was 120m away) seemed less conclusive than the saints "no try" vs Salford for makinson (an example I use given both were looking at the grounding) - since everyone (well not everyone, the more hyperbolic) on here is calling for consistency, where's the consistency in that?

I assure you, I've watched the game plenty! You now just seem to be complaining about every single decision that didn't go huddersfields way, regardless of whether it was the correct call or not.

Is irony a bit out of your scope then?

I disagree with that,:- Smith (video ref) at the time would have OKd it, as looking from behind the sticks the ball never veers out at all and carries on with a good foot to spare. That is the only positive way to observe it and it can`t lie from that position. At that time Smith would not have known what decision Bentham would have given if it had been referred. It is only after all the derision and anger towards Bentham that the officials have closed ranks.

He couldn't be bothered listening to anymore whining and crying from you lot?

Anyone in Huddersfield watched boots and all tonight???

No please enlighten us

Watch it, I'm sure you'll feel much better about your opening post.

Quote ="Durham Giant"No please enlighten us'" Here you go: www1.skysports.com/watch/video/t ... was-brough?

Quote ="Durham Giant"No please enlighten us'" Here you go: www1.skysports.com/watch/video/t ... was-brough?

Quote ="Magic Superbeetle"Here you go: www1.skysports.com/watch/video/t ... was-brough?'" Inconclusive from the angles and St Helens players all offside when charging down the attempts says john kear

Quote ="Magic Superbeetle"Here you go: www1.skysports.com/watch/video/t ... was-brough?'" Inconclusive from the angles and St Helens players all offside when charging down the attempts says john kear

There has been a few fans saying it didn't go over from behind the sticks.
There must be at least 1 Huddersfield fan that had a good enough angle and admit it didn't go over?

Regards to the guy who said Ferres shouldn't be banned. I think you are thinking of a different incident in a different game and a different sport from another country.
In fact I think you may have posted on the wrong forum.

As expected then all the 'it was definitely was a drop goal' people are sticking to their guns or just staying silent, despite being shown that it was not a drop goal or at best inconclusive.

A far cry from a dead cert drop goal.

I'm sure now the question has been answered the chairman may want to write another letter. But then to be fair they are not known for changing their minds over on this side of the hills. For Stubbornness see Bulls signing Harris, Huddersfield sacking Mason

Is this still going????? ZZzzzzzzz

You say ZZzzzzzzz, but keep coming back?

Just cos I'm surprised you are all still whinging about it

? Are we? Or is it just us responding to the many trolls that seem to be diving out from under their bridges? Must be troll breeding season.

Here's a tip then - don't respond!

The Chairman, as far as i know, hasn't commented on it, he certainly hasn't wrote any letters !!

All?

its ok when its not your team

Shelley .....you need to get a life....

So Bentham is right and all those calling him a cheat or a thief look silly, gutting if it's your team but it was ultimately the right decision.