Just had a look at the pies forum,i think the world has ended unreal....

The one with the shirts in the shop is hillarious.

I keep popping over there for a word - can't help it!!

Is that at the Wrigan Rugby League Shop

id be more bothered about our season than wigans.

I think we all are but they should be getting a lot better results than they are doing.

On balance I think a good Wigan side is good for the game in terms of the crowds they attract both at their place and at away grounds.

Their crowd last night was poor by their standards and it,ll be surprising if they take many down to London for their next match/defeat.

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if Mr. Lennegan still has "an interest" in the Bronquins??

Not that I am suggesting for a moment, that if he does, that would, in any way, have a baring on the result.........

I'd ask the question on "Cherry & $hyte"......but they'd think I was trolling!!

Last I heard he was struggling to rid himself of the Quins but dont know for definate if he did.

Can't understand it......you'd think he'd have potential investors beating his door down, what with the game being so high profile in the nation's capital.....or so "3-Day Weak"* Lewis and his cronies would have you believe!!

















[size=75*= N.B. - this is NOT a spelling mistake!![/size

I was talking to him when we played W***n and at that time he still owned the Bronquins.

is that allowed? owning 2 clubs in the same league??

depends on who you are , and the cronies you know

In Leneghan's case I think I'm right in saying that he had to ask permission to buy W***n because he was still the owner of Bronquins, they gave him permission but told him that there was a time limit to owning both clubs, also that he had to have no dealings in the running of the Bronquins. I'm not sure what the time limit was but I'm sure there can't be long left on it - what are they going to do though? He can only sell it if someone is willing to buy it.

And by the same token, neither is it funny or original.

Yes from what I have been reading on their forum.

He doesn't [iown[/i Quins, nor have any dealings in their day-to-day operation, though I think he does still own a small number of shares. No different to how many clubs Arthur Thomas has been involved with, in my mind.

He owns considerably more than a 'small number' of shares Matt - I think you'll find that he's the majority shareholder - and a big majority at that.

Then let's just hope Quins hammer them next week to dispel any conspiracy theories

Well my money is certainly on the Quins.