Ha, you must be confusing me who gives a about what happened to Brown. Read my first post again and MY point is that it appeared that Carty wasn't given enough time...........the same thing as Brown that's all. This leads to the impression that a gun was jumped or even a possibility that a mistake was made in the choice of both.
If your so concerned 'll ask for you but personally Im happy with where we are.

Laughable your last replies mate, youve banged on about Brown consistently in fact on one of your earlier posts your asking why he wasnt retained as back up? Please do ask Paul at the next forum im always interested in the Q&A.

As for being tied in knots, this morning youve stated you are happy with where we are vs last night when you questioned scouting/recruitment etc..

I'll leave it there and let the rest of the forum posters who go on in here still, make their own mind up on your inputs to this thread..

Have a a great day ****

Still confused are you ? Read the threads again and you'll find nowhere where I said I liked Brown It was YOU who asked why I mentioned Brown and I have explained why ie time. It's not my fault if your not bright enough to see the point I made but Im sure you'll get over it.
By trying to bring in the playing aspects of Brown and his position in the make up of the team your muddying the water.
Its getting boring now trying to make it simple for you but I'll give it just one more try, here goes.

I replied that It was a very short time that Carty had to prove his worth. I compared this to Browns fiasco. not once did I go into playing tactics or ever mention my preference to Brown over any other, I even state that I didn't really rate him even but you still seem infatuated with him to keep bringing him up. It could have been Joe Bloggs who was brought in with a bang and out with a whimper in a short time, I would then have compared Carter to joe Bloggs. The names are irrelevant, it was the amount of time and ONLY the amount of time that I commented on. Every other reply I've done is to (TRY) and explain that to you but hey-ho I'll have to admit your a lost cause, and yes I'll have a great day thank you.

Happy days....

Neither the club or Dan have made a statement, but a fan stated he left at the end of his probationary period when it was probably during as that period is normally 3 months minimum in my experience, the only bit missed is that a player is contracted for a fixed period which an employee isn't - fans will debate Brown, or any player, because its what fans do on a fans messageboard and HH is certainly a fan.

It must be closed season when we have this many pages about not a great deal, recruitment isn't a science and employee's and employers often get it wrong for all sorts of reasons.

All to be revealed in an exclusive in The Times tomorrow!

Brilliant



Do you think it will also be on News at Ten

Really impressed with that Michael

I think the best way to respond to silliness is with silliness

Now your just being silly..................................................i know i know

So are you telling me I would find out wots wot if I bought the Times tomorrow ?



No smart replies please' I have a Sony colour TV and a mobile phone so I am not fooled easily.

Look, it is probably quite simple. Maybe he could not find the time to both work for Leigh and play for the All Blacks.