go for it... and expose the ones that are breaking the rules!

ther are a million and one ways to break the SC legally,bonuses,loyalty payments etc it just sounds like the Dr wants to do it in the open for all to see,why is that a problem?

Go for it Doc, equality by mediocrity is not the way to run a business

Salford aren't a big enough club to get away with it though.
Although unless a point deduction means you can go down, he won't be bothered about a pouncy little fine!!!!

The Good Doctor was at Chester Races this afternoon along with Brian Noble and a few Salford players watching their horse Salford Red Devil finish 3rd .

What has happened to mi owd mate Tiswallace ?Has he emigrated



i miss his amusing posts .

Salford should go for it and show what a nest of vipers are actually running the game.


Tiswallace is probably in a period of banishment.

Thinks he's been banned permanently not my me of course

There are ways to hide it, but the rules are quite prescriptive and any clubs found organising or linked to outside payments to players will be hit hard if they're discovered.

=#BF0000[iI agree with you, but it's slanderous so I have to remove it. Apologies.[/i MW

We Leythers have integrity.

I will lay money the club I support will not breach the salary cap.

Us Leythers have always adhered to the games rules. We are special.

The salary cap is not legal under EU company law (Like wendyball FFP), there are no special laws for sports clubs. He will probably have to take it to the EU courts mind (like Bosman). Or is he playing poker with the RFL who may not have the guts or finance for the fight.......

I didn't think Cartels were lawfull either but how long has RL had one ?

Ages, but only because nobody challenged it. SL franchising was probably on very dodgy legal ground as well.

BANNED , this is terrible , the young man is a Legend , i would give him his own Radio Show

his knowledge on Rugby and Horses is to good to lose ,come back Tiswallace .

ABY , i didnt know the RFL played Poker , has nobody told them we play at the Centurion ?As they havent made an appearence yet .

Well although this might get me into bother with moderators first of all I have no idea why Tiswallace has been banned but I would like to know why because there are several posts on here I sometimes disagree with but so what ?

Aren't people entitled to their opinions even when you don't agree with that opinion ?

I am a great believer in free speech and when the day comes when everyone posts only those things they want to hear I think we would have a fans board which would soon become very boring.

I am a regular on here and I don't give a monkeys if people disagree with what I post. We all have our own views likes and dislikes and maybe if I was responsible for broadcasting the news on TV or radio I honestly think I would even have allowed anti European which Nigel Farrar spouts every time he is on TV or the radio.

I heard a successful UKIP councellor'when asked on TV recently when asked what UKIP stood for.

She replied we had to get rid of immigrants as Lincolnshire was swamped by them and the potholes needed fixing.

Live and let live is my motto and I would ask that the mod who banned this poster to think again on this one.

And just before I visit the off licence for another bottle of sherry I shall be watching Leigh under 20's 2morrow.

Tiswallace was banned because of a vendetta he had against me. This wasn't a simple 'difference of opinion', it was a full on vendetta. I wasn't the one who banned him but I was the one who requested that he be dealt with.

He was given numerous warnings but he chose to ignore the requests to moderate his behaviour until the mods had no other option but to issue him with a ban.

If you want to know more I suggest you ask him.

I would if I knew who he was.

Frank i know him , he is a good bloke , believe me , he even organised a couple of our Racing tips comps , i have been through all his recent posts and find very little to be offensive , maybe a little suggestive , but nothing more .

In no way way is he anything other than a Leyther who speaks his mind , maybe some folk dont agree with him , but so what , id better watch my Ps AND Qs or i will be next .



.

He made general attacks against Mish. He was warned.

He continued to make the same accusations with choice, yet obvious, use of words. He received a short ban and a further warning.

The behaviour continued when he returned so he got a permanent ban.

My issues were with a small number of his posts and despite having this explained in clear terms, he continued to pursue the topic. Bans will be issued if a user continues behaviour they have been warned about. Very few warnings are issued, the average is lower than 1 a month.

And can someone tell me how any of this relates to Salford breaking the rules?

Michael this has nothing to do with Salford breaking the rules , it was just me asking where Tiswallace was ?As i said ive been through his recent posts and find nothing offensive in them , as for Vendettas ?You know what Jim Royle would say

.

Have you considered the fact that there's more to the story than the posts you see on here?

Everyone who uses a message board should be treated with respect regardless of their/your opinion and all members should follow the rules of the site. No one should have to put up with the kind of abuse that was directed at me and if he had done it to another member I wouldn't have hesitated to deal with him in the same fashion.

Please believe me when I say that it takes a lot to upset me but if you think his behaviour is acceptable then this isn't the place I want to be.

Whatever he has said or done about you or to you , must be classed as personal , and has nowt to to with this Forum or me for that matter , in the past ive had Verbal abuse directed at me , but if the said culprits started postings on this Forum , i wouldnt try to get them banned .

Personal grievances have nowt to do with this Forum , and shouldnt appear in posts , thats all im saying .

Politely, I disagree.

Generally Tiswallace's posts were in the spirit of the forum. However, after 3 separate requests to stop, he continued prodding at Mish with particular phrases. He knew full well what he was doing and the reaction it was likely to provoke.

Tiswallace has ample opportunity to avoid getting banned, but he just couldn't leave it alone.

Exactly, he shouldn't have brought his personal grievances towards me onto this site (it's only classed as personal when he says it to my face, or in private where no one else can see it). When he does it on a forum he's breaking the rules:

[i2. Member Conduct

2.1. Comments that are meant to upset or cause distress to other members are prohibited on this site.
* We will not tolerate threatening or abusive behaviour. Anyone who is found guilty of acting this way toward any other member risks being banned from RLFANS.
* This includes messages sent via the private message system.
[/i

The point is, as has been explained earlier, he was given three opportunities to stop what he was doing, but he chose to ignore the advice of the mods and carry on with his childish vendetta.