news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 059810.stm Looking for two years. Saints only offering him one. Not for me, but I'm sure there'll be some folk out there who could see the merit in having him. I actually think his performances this year, overall, haven't been that great, first signs of decline really.

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 059810.stm Looking for two years. Saints only offering him one. Not for me, but I'm sure there'll be some folk out there who could see the merit in having him. I actually think his performances this year, overall, haven't been that great, first signs of decline really.

Would rather pay a fee for Myler in all honesty.. 1 year maybe 2 years NAR....

Would depend on where we are going with Monas and Briers. If they go whay not have Long and Myler? As much as I don't like him I would have him in my team.

no never, wouldn't have him if he paid us to play.
What are we, warrington retirement home ?

Stop gap for Thurston?

Nope, I'd rather Keep Briers, he'd be 33 in september i think.

There probably would have been a decent chance of him coming had his best mate Gleeson still of been here, but I wouldn't have him now anyway.

Maybe Wigan seeing as Tim Smith is homesick

No. It would have made sense when we last tried to sign him, probably not so much any more.

He's been an outstanding player though and I don't understand why he is hated so much. It's not his fault he plays for a much better team than us.

But he is ugly though isn't he?
Is he having a bet on who he signs for?

no point getting rid of Briers and signing someone of a similar age

retaining Briers is a far better option

I would suggest not signing Long and releasing Briers would be an even better option.

Yeah, maybe we can have a go with 3 hookers starting every game next year.

Could Long could keep his face straight when he took the Warrington oath in front of the media:

"I came here to win trophies and play in major finals. This is a club going places and I wanted to be part of it"

Perhaps he could pick a face in the crowd and think of all the pain and suffering and all that other that guy wrote in the guardian the other week.

I can't see this being an option really & doesn't seem to fit in with Tony Smith's new philosophy with the club.

For me, he's past his best & his current performances are driven by his passion for Saints. I ca'nt see him being anywhere near that passionate for any other club, let alone ours.

He would be better looking for a decent deal in NL1, where he would be a very effective weapon.

I would agree with that, even reading that interview it is clear he still has a passion for Saints and doesn't really want to leave. If he does go I can see him ending up at a Salford/Celtic type club who could really make use of him.