Like the home shirt but hate the away. Black and red just isn't us imo despite the historical link. Also stripes are for Wendy ball not RL.

INOUT
No, point Taken


But to be fair the second and third picture apart from 1 stripe are pretty much the same

Will we make a clean sweep this year?

No, that's for the Vileda sponsorship in 2022.

Not a chance - We will, however, suck big time!!

Home shirt is okay, but to state the obvious the big red panic button doesn’t suit the style and colour of the shirt.

It’s pleasing to see that we’ve manage to tie down a household name as a shirt sponsor in Hoover, but you would think a bit more thought would go into how it looks on our main kit, given that we play 80% of our games in it.

The away one is much better, probably my favourite alternative kit for some time.

I think quite a few people will be put off by the 'panic button' on the home shirt. It looks like a super hero top ( Hoover Man ). Fortunately it blends in with the away strip.

I hope the overlarge logo size reflects a massive sponsorship fee.

I like both shirts. I don’t mind the home sponsor logo to be honest, think it provides a nice contrast and looks smart overall. I do prefer the away kit though but not sure I could be persuaded to part with £50 for it!!

Hooverman, don’t make him angry as he will stop sucking and blow you away ( perhaps more pornstar than super hero).

Hooverman is so fast, you won't see him for dust !

Hoovering up the opposition...

Hoover...damn!

Both shirts are OK until they put the sponsors logo on them. Ironically the logo on the "painted" shirts at the kit launch appeared to be slightly smaller and it looked a lot better.

As an aside, replace "Hoover" with "hit here" and they have just put a target on every one of our players chest?

So even though we are the Primrose and Blue, we have yet another blue and primrose kit.

I suppose some years there’s hardly been any primrose though so at least there’s a good amount with the chevrons. But I would like a Primrose and Blue kit for once!

Cue the “yellow bellies” comments!

A couple I quickly created on O'Neills kit creator.

[urlhttps://share.icloud.com/photos/05HH7RW7K2nNOm1kZjKzFO7wg[/url

[urlhttps://share.icloud.com/photos/0B10y79oCHuLVwLOJ0MI2hzyw[/url

Gives an idea of how the Hoover logo could have been adapted to blend in too. I got the logo and edited the background.

I'd like to see a Wire version of the old Wigan/Hull 80's kits, with irregular hoops.

That's fair enough but hoovers Logo is White lettering with a Red Logo, if they're paying us a load of Money for sponsorship i doubt they'll change their whole Corporate brand for 1 rugby league team.
I'm not a fan of the massive logo but if they're pumping a load of cash in to the club they wouldn't be happy with a tiny logo.

Hooverman, Hooverman
Gets wherever a Hoover can
And ends up in A+E if the apocryphal stories are to believed (I know it doesn’t scan).

imagine thinking a worldwide brand are going to CHANGE their company logo so as to make a shirt look a bit nicer.

"Thanks for your excellent sponsorship offer Hoover... Just one small thing... Could we turn your logo blue please"

The Chinese owners of Hoover (Techtronic Industries) have agreed £70m a year shirt sponsorship deal with Man Utd

Not bought a shirt since O'Neils became shirt makers. Sizing is poor especially for the ladies. Quality isn't as good as previous years imo. The red circle certainly doesn't look right. We understand we need big sponsors but not slap bang in the middle of your chest, or is it just a target for a pass for the players to aim at.

We certainly need that when Clarke is not dummy half.

Maybe the Hoover logo is a fiendishly cunning technological breakthrough that does actually suck, thus ensuring that once the ball has been caught it sticks to the chest (this would also ensure that tackled players cannot break out of a tackle)

Pure genius is what I call it!