Leeds Hence being on the left where the home team usually always is ...

I would guess that SKY organised this game before the League 1 play-off semi-final, so they would have to consider Leeds getting through and playing on Sunday, and as they would probably make a weekend of it, they would have to consider that many Leeds Rhinos fans could be Leeds United fans...

Just a guess though...

I know where its being played, the question was why its being played today. They don't usually have Super League matches on a Tuesday.

Just SKY i'd imagine, can't complain. Both are out of the CC too, so they won't mind the later fixture etc.

Ta, can never have too many RL games on the box like you say.

Leeds to beat the -14 handicap I reckon.

won my Hudds leeds double, put the winnings on Man Utd to win 1-0 at 8/1

Just to get this straight, you said forget about the team sheets, forget about the weather, it's on sky so get on FC +16











Your mad as a box of frogs.

no mate it has been statistically proven since sky started showing superleague that this certain bet,has made big profits every year.

last night was the 1st game in 6 this season that has failed..

You know, 95% of stats are completely made up.

That's pretty much 1 in 6 in terms of things I say on here.

Regardless of statistics if your willing to put money on a team just because they have a big handicap and there on Sky your not right in the head.

Weather conditions, team news, home/away advantage, form, non of these things mattered much to you because it was on sky



.

when it makes profits annually,yes.

think you may have misread earlier in the thread.
i discount team news only in sl games and not nl games

That was a belter, so you only discount team news in SL games and not NL games.

You stick at it fella.

yep,cause at sl level,every player who has signed for a certain team,is considered good enough to play for that club in that position for which he has signed.Be it Leeds or Celtic.

with the lower leagues i find it far more important because they are only part-time. Just my way of looking at something different to the rest.Take tomorrows Fev/Leigh game. i make it +12 leigh,if thats available i'd be taking Leigh,just for the fact that Harris aint playing and that is a massive loss for Fev.

just looked now and ladbrokes go Leigh +12,which is right to my handicap,but that wont last,the others are 8-10 and being bet

They maybe considered good enough for there own team but when you put them against the opposition one becomes better than the other.

Ainscough maybe good enough to play Left Wing for Wigan but up against Matt King he doesn't stand a chance.

United to beat Barcelona and Wire to beat Hull KR double.

I've backed Man United outright to win the Champions League on Betfair, just to compensate if they do manage to lift the trophy. This is one bet I don't mind losing.

ha ha me too

who were the other 5 then....i know saints covered the h.cap when they thrashed catalans in the cup the other week

Doing the Leigh game in running tomorrow me, Harris isn’t that much of a loss in all honesty been gash what ive seen of him so far this season. An old timer looking for extra money could not handle going to Celtic coz Super League was way too much for him. Interesting to see Mick Nanyn has signed for Leigh on loan if he does play tomorrow then he's good for at least 12 points he is a goal kicking machine..

As for CC h'caps here goes..

Hull KR V's Wire

Hull KR -4

Depending on whom you prefer. 2 form teams at the mo but KR just get the nod considering they were -2 In Edinburgh. I fancy Warrington which makes us a tasty 6/4 shot after seeing us go so close in Scotland without Morley or Briers and with Hicks back we could all be going to Wembley folks (PLEASE GOD).

Wigan Salford

Wigan -10

I fancy Salford to really give the Pies a game and am seriously going out to get Wigan, They looked very good against Saints in Scotland and everyone was like Wigan this and Wigan that, Joke stuff in all honesty, Won 2 at home all season and I think Salford will come here full of confidence and im going for them in this one. -10 will probably be at the lower end of the market you will prob be able to get -12 and maybe even -14 just because its Wigan don’t let that cloud you judgement Wigan are very very average.

Gateshead v's St Helens

Gateshead +48

Its going to be men against boys for many parts of this game and it will be down to Saints to turn the screw early and they could run riot if they score early. Gateshead are progressing well and with the 3 new Aussie recruits could give Saints problems for the 1st 20 minutes but after that Saints should roll them over. I hope im wrong and we get Gateshead in the Semi's but I cant see it happening to be honest. Many firms will be around this mark maybe higher and maybe lower depends on which way you look at it.


Huddersfield v's Castleford

Huddersfield -4

When you think Castleford were -6 for the game just the other week you could think that this game would be a lot closer then usual. And I agree in terms of quality this game is the other tie of the round (Other then ours) and this is going to be a fantastic CC tie. I see this being a little like the Hull KR Wire game and am going for Huddersfield -4 on the fact they have had 2 decent Super League results and im happy to lay then at -4. Castleford on the other hand have been in good shape themselves this season and I can see this one going to the Wire with 2-4 points settling this one.



Hope my insight may help others on here as we need to pay the bills some how.

I tried to point out earlier in the thread that Live Wired talks alot of nonsense, I see the penny is dropping with others too!



Sorry, fella, that's just nonsense. You are suggesting that in any 25 man squad, all 25 players are exactly equal in terms of quality and experience and ability to play certain positions. So, let's say a club has all of it's halfbacks injured, or all of it's top 5 earners injured, you genuinely think it makes no difference. You are just wrong!

heres this weekends h.caps
-10 feath v leigh +10
-12 wigan v salford +12
-12 barrow v sheff +12
+50 g.head v saints -50
-4 hull kr v wire +4
+6 celtic v wakey -6
+10 batley v widnes -10
-32 w.haven v donny +32
-8 hudds v cas +8
-46 keighley v worky +46
+48 l.skols v hunslet -48
-10 swint v r.dale +10
+14 york v dewsbury -14


fancy
wire +4
hudds -8
hunslet -48

Wire +4 looks a bit tasty, ive been saying for weeks that they will win on Saturday but even if they don't i cant see many points being in it.

Seb,stop acting like a woodbine.What has top 5 earners got to do with my reasoning.For the hard of understanding,Im saying that if Leeds bought player"A" its because they think he has the desired qualities to play upto the level that Leeds demand and the same comment goes for Celtic.

As for your half back rubbish,say Long and Pryce were injured,do you then think that Eastmond and say Clough,would'nt be good enough to step?Burrow never played for Leeds the other night,by your reasoning then,Sinfied is crap and not good enough to play for Leeds.

And as for this top 5 earners,until a few weeks ago,Matt King and Michael Monaghan had lynch mobs after them.both re top 5 earners and neither has proved to be money well spent.

I have my own opinions and reasonings,it seems Seb lacks these qualities and acts like a sheep and follows the crowd.

I understand your points but look at it this way:-

If all of Saints squad developed 'the s' after a particularly dodgy curry, they would be forced to play their reserves/academy players. By your logic, that wouldn't have ANY impact on either Saints prospects of winning or the betting. Surely you must agree that this is a ridiculous position to take?

Team and injury news is a big factor. It affects what players are playing. Most of the time, the players affect the result more than any other factor.

You telling me that Clough and Eastmond are as good as Long and Pryce