Absolutely right pal - unbelievable isn't it?

wonder if the club will appeal?

Should do! What is Solomona's previous like?

Haha you just edited it thats even worse

Thicko

Is Coventry Warrior! being added to the fail list?

So for the Wigan game we could be missing, Morley, Westwood, Solomona, Hodgson and Grix.

to be fair i've just seen the Hansen incident ....i'm not suprised he got found not guilty.





























see..........

I think so

He answered if Solomona was banned as well on Goon board "Yes"

2 mins after he's shown up on here its edited to "Not sure"

LOLZ

So does Solomona have any previous incidents which may have worked against him?

he had "seconds" at an RFL banquet once.



I think they still have that on his record. Other than clean as a whistle

Bit like his plate then

bit like your fishing licence then?

I only have a provisional fishing licence at present...

and a mouthful of maggots and hooks.

Very bad news for us I think.

Wigan have a slight upper hand.

Perhaps it could just be that Hansen was NOT guilty, and Solomona WAS.

That's why they have the review isn't it?

stinks

if we appeal and it doesn't get overturned do we think Hill will/should get a call up??

i too smell a rat...

Typical Red Hall - about as consistent as a lumpy rice pudding. Oh look, I've just found a nine bob note as well.
Is Maurice secreted away in Red Hall - just a thought.
Anyway, if Wigan beat us, we can at least point to the injury list and the shenanigans of Wigan and their apparent hold over Red Hall.

Good shout.

That many players out we could do with him and with good reason, even with 5 first team player out though I still fancy our chances after what they did in France, never thought I would say that with so many key players out.

I posted on the Wigan board several hours ago in response to some Warrington trolls. I have not had any meaningful response.

If you were to watch the Hansen incident on Sky+, you would have to agree it was an innocuous challenge. He should have never been cited. Ironically, Hock could and should have been cited as he gave a sort of punch to a Bradford player's head. If he had been banned, I would have accepted it even though it would have been harsh.

How bad was Solomona's tackle/challenge? - that is the crux of the matter and something that needs to be discussed and if it was bad, then just admit it. Has anyone on here actually seen TV footage of the tackle? If it was innocuous, then the ban should be overturned.

i was there and can't even recall it occuring and i'm pretty bad at calling out(being honest) over house tactics from our own players

To be honest I haven't got a clue about the Solomona one. But there was absolutely nothing in the Hansen one and I'm not suprised its been not guilty.

Has anyone found the Solomona one on Sky+ yet?