i thought he had been sent off to get cream on too, in a similar vain to a blood bin sub but they only had Mitchell to replace him who also has similar hair and skin issues

The only difference I could put between the Riley decision and the Gilmour decision was the field position that each team had, Hudds were in our 20 and we were definitely on the back foot, whereas Hicks was only around the half-way line.

I don't know if this affected Smith's decision making or what. Some odd decisions yesterday, this is what we have come to expect.

we could call it the "skin bin".....

I do worry for James graham in these conditions he's the whitest individual I have ever seen (well except for 'whitey' off "me myself and Irene"icon_wink.gif

tell me browny..

"what drugs are you this week" ?

but if its a professional foul than its an automatic sin bin isnt it

He is so white he is translucent! I wonder if Smithy checks for "changes in mole appearance or size" after every game? Is it itchy?

good cover play by him though

You must have never seen WWE's Sheamus O'Shaunessy then haha -

oh dear.

Like to joke about people who have skin cancer do you .Not funny and a post like this should not be allowed.

Sinbinnings in 2010:

Sean O'Loughlin - 0
Chris Riley - 2.

Says it all really.

Chris Riley - 16 tries.

Sod O'loughlin- about 5 or 6 me thinks.




says it all really , ( and even playin 20 mins less than the sod)