I saw it on the big screen and it looked good from one angle and never a try from the other. But the telling factor was the players reaction, i got the impression he knew it wasn't a try from the lack of celebration

I actually thought you should have had a penalty in extra time, when the third attempt by Briers (?) missed and Briscoe brought it from the in-goal area Bentham called "1st" and Briscoe moved off the mark got tackled again and then again shouted "1st", would of been harsh but was a definite penalty IMO.

Carvell offside was the penalty award

Fingertip pressure is all you need.
He had it.

1 from each club actually.
Colin Hutton usually from Rovers.

Bentham is a disgrace, and I'm usually very considerate to the referee, he kept Rovers in it by dreaming up penalties, absolute..s***house

The RFL need to look into the time keeping incident, Bentham clearly stopped the clock and should have had the balls to demand the time be put back on.

And not forgetting the 5m forward pass by King... but let's just talk about the timekeeping from BOTH club officials that may or may not have given Wire 4 secs to do something... Blinkers boys

There was a just as blatant forward pass in the build up to the Webster try that HKR are spanking their collective monkey about!

What a flowery £wa£ you really are!!

Correct and strangely none of them noticed it.

momentum ruling as king kept running, clever play from the man in the Wig

Not half bad... you must know me

They also said in the commentary there are two times keepers on from Hull Kr and one from Warrington to keep each other honest.

Bentham said even though he called time off once the hooter has sounded thats that.

At the end of the day it didn't cost us the win so lets not get too hung up on it leave it for Cummings to sort out his performance.

Agreed with you fully there. Gene should have been at least yellow carded for that high tackle even though he missed the intent was there.

Mathers tackle was a proffesional foul so 10 minutes deserved there too.

Why didn't Bentham let Clarke play on instead of forming the scrum? That was a very poor decision.

Of course I'm only gonna point out the bad decisions from a Rovers fan point of view but;

1) Mathers should have got 10mins as Fox was on Whelam's shoulder and one of them would have been under the sticks.

2) Anderson's knock on at the play the ball late in the game.

3) Mathers foot was in touch late in the game and we should have had a scum 10m from the line.

I'm sure Wire fans would be able to point out similar errors but I thought Wire deserved to win even though no team deserved to lose.

correct apart from number 3, he was 2mm inside

He wasn't backed up by his touch judges, tv ref or the time keepers. Even if he had a great game there still would have been too many talking points.

PS since when have they started showing the video that the TV ref is watching while he is making his decision at the ground?

As the error was after a completed tackle, he has to set the scrum.

Some poor reffing decisions, but I think Wire had a little more luck with them.

King's forward pass for Clarke's try.
Forward pass in the Webster try.
Swings and roundabouts.

To be honest though the key difference for me was that Rovers made errors in the wrong part of the pitch ie their half.

Either side could have won - I'm just glad to have got through it.

bentham had a shocker...the penalty for offside at the end i can live with,but during extra time and briers attempted drop goals were any of there players onside...to even get any where near briers the rovers players must have pace like hussain bolt...he did`nt blow then...

Definitely think those white boots he was wearing saved him there

Could not believe what I was seeing yesterday shocking.