|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 5729 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| A bit disappointed in the half’s, a couple of nice balls for tries but overall not enough ball distribution for me, defensively a bit weak but as mentioned a good run out for the young lads, I agree that Patton was the best player on the pitch
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2964 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I've had a good look at the first 28 mins of the game. Musgrove only lasted 27/28 mins before being taken off. I particularly watched Musgrove/Wood/Russell though Whitehead got through a lot of early work.
Musgrove took the ball up to the opposition 7 times, Russell 5 and Wood 4. The tougher carries (from KO & close to the ruck) were made by Musgrove. Musgrove lost the ball in a three man tackle once. Russell lost it once. Musgrove also gave a penalty away for delaying the opposition player getting to his feet. Wood stood wider from the play the ball. I think our play lost something from about the 30 minute mark.
Musgrove does seem to frustrate a few (who know a lot about the game) but in those 27 minutes he made quite a contribution.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1218 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="Smiffy27":2zjbsuao]I've had a good look at the first 28 mins of the game. Musgrove only lasted 27/28 mins before being taken off. I particularly watched Musgrove/Wood/Russell though Whitehead got through a lot of early work.
Musgrove took the ball up to the opposition 7 times, Russell 5 and Wood 4. The tougher carries (from KO & close to the ruck) were made by Musgrove. Musgrove lost the ball in a three man tackle once. Russell lost it once. Musgrove also gave a penalty away for delaying the opposition player getting to his feet. Wood stood wider from the play the ball. I think our play lost something from about the 30 minute mark.
Musgrove does seem to frustrate a few (who know a lot about the game) but in those 27 minutes he made quite a contribution.[/quote:2zjbsuao]
I watched Musgrove closely last night - did a lot of work in the time he was on the pitch, ran very hard and while he didn't break the line it was taking three men to bring him down. I thought he did pretty well. To be honest I think the Widnes defence deserves a huge amount of credit. Cai Taylor-Wray saw a lot of the ball and was very threatening with ball in hand but they dealt with him more effectively than some SL teams did last season. I don't think he broke the line once.
Ben Harthill was excellent, a really promising option if one of Walker or Powell are injured or rested, strong in defence and good running and distribution.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2865 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The reason Widnes dealt with CTW very well is that we are clearly persisting with giving the full back the ball on the 5th every single time. Fine as a tactic but for crying out loud mix it up a bit - it is so easily dealt with as last night proved.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2964 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="ratticusfinch":1ijuyx3m]The reason Widnes dealt with CTW very well is that we are clearly persisting with giving the full back the ball on the 5th every single time. Fine as a tactic but for crying out loud mix it up a bit - it is so easily dealt with as last night proved.[/quote:1ijuyx3m]
To be honest it is pathetic & quite the worst idea the coaching team have had. Both Dufty & CTW will suffer physically for this. I am generally positive about Wire but this one is plain daft. Far too much was asked of CTW last night.
A couple of times a game only.
|
|
|
|
|