Why not make it a 23 match season. First past the post wins the title. Better quality games with more preparation time. No double weekends and time for proper international games.
Will ensure better player welfare and should improve the standard of the game.
Although not rocket science no doubt it will be shot down in flames

How do association football fans not understand it? Do they not watch ANY others sports? Because rugby league, the other rugby, Gridiron, basketball, field hockey, ice hockey, netball... leagues all over the world are all run with a play-off system. And even association football is in some leagues around the world including the Argentine league.

But by ing God do I wish the RFL would just stick with something. I'm sick to ing death of the constant changes. For me it's one of the primary reasons the sport has been going backwards. It's becoming a joke! I wish the RLIF would bring in a law that meant that league cannot change formats for a decade after a previous change.

Clubs need the revenue from gate receipts. 11 home games simply isn't enough.

I've set up a poll on the virtual terrace asking this question

Agree with this, I actually think the current system is quite good in terms of promition/ relegation and also rewarding good form through the season. The cynic in me wonders if it's got anything to do with wigan having no chance of making the GF then the rules get changed.