According to Paul Highton on twitter.

Oh well theyve installed a yes man as predicted.Good job there is no relegation..

I wouldn't have thought all the interviews had concluded,yet.Particularly with the MEN report on Goulding today,which did not state he had been interviewed.
Out of interest,what was the win/loss ratio when Phil Veivers was in temporary charge ?

A coach that the club officials can control the club only have ambitions for finishing in bottom 2 poor call I think veievers for me when he took charge we were awful in defence I won't be wasting my hard earned cash watching a club who won't do anything in the league. Top eight not a chance.

Yeah it must of taken months just to go through the application forms alone,then the interviews an all.

Stop teaseing us by saying you won't be coming to games, just simply don't bother.

You'll not be missed in the slightest.

Why are you such a d1ckhead. Why dont you stop going and do us all a favour.Your such a doo gooder .I think your wilky in disguise....

On the plus side. Even if they up his wage this should put some extra money in the kitty for 1 more signing.

Wild also confirmed it on twitter. Time to get behind him. Personally thought we played some good rugby when he was in charge last season.

and we got some good hidings aswell......

Defence was none exsistent under vievers

If it's true then good luck to him.

I like him as a fella and one thing's for sure, on the rocky boat that is Salford this appointment will settle the ship at the right time. The players like him, he already has an idea of what he has to play with and now he gets a little bit of freedom to call the shots properly.

Too many people on here want change change change with regards to coaching without fully understanding the dynamics of a Club environment. Vievers is a safe choice, granted, but not necessarily a bad one.

Joel Moon got his visa today.

Bit unfair to judge a stand-in coach for a few games based on a training and management regime that was already in place.

Absolute drivel........ if its a good choice.under what basis ?

He's aware of the systems in place at the Club.
He's familiar with how the Club is run.
He's already built relationships with his players.
He's aware of what is required to improve the team.
The players respect and like him.
He's aware of budgets.
He's aware of the constraints in place.
He's unlikely to run away at the first sign of adversity.
He understands and has experience of SL.
The team does not have the worry of wholesale changes that are not based on knowledge.
He's aware of the reality of coaching Salford.
etc etc

I didn't say he would be a good choice, just that he wouldn't be the worst choice. I respect the fact that you are an expert at spotting/writing drivel when it's written so I'll refrain from further comment.

At least give the bloke a chance, I seem to recall when Vievers took charge last time you shower did okish.

It's a sad state of affairs when a Swinton fan makes more sense than most of the 'Salford' fans on here.

I refer to my previous post reference drivel.

I like what you did their with my post. You take points which you asked for and superglued your own moronic ideas of what you believe happens in your imaginary world of Salford RLFC over the top. Thus proving nothing except your opinions are just that. Opinions. Genius.

Thanks DI.

Everyone else can can now sleep soundly.

How would you know Eccles? You don't go to matches. I seem to remember that Warrington - yes those free scoring chaps from down the road - didn't score too many tries against us at the HJ?

In defence of eccles i seem to remember we played warrington in the same weekend most of their squad players played in the international fixture 2 days prior, Thats why we won that game.

Irrelevant DI and a very weak point