I don't see a problem with not publishing detailed injury news. Do you want the opposition to know who they need to prepare to face or do you want to keep them guessing? I'm not saying that's what we are doing, but I'd think that would be a fairly reasonable way to play it.

You can't, just a simple prognosis and an approximate would suffice. The reason I brought this up was when Dobson was injured at Leigh we hadn't a clue about the extent of his injury. And if he was likely to be sidelined for a week, a month or 6 months. By contrast if Wayne Rooney got injured at United supporters would know within a couple of days approximately what the injury was and approximately how long he was likely to be out for.

Hes starting tonight

A decent compromise might be to list the injured players on a web page and use a traffic light system. Green meaning good chance of being fit for the next game, amber meaning slim chance of being fit for the next game, red meaning no chance of being fit for the next game. Then you provide some insight for the fans while maintaining some professional ambiguity.

This. In this day and age it's the least any club could do to to let one of their admin spend 10 minutes updating an intranet page with basic Injury info. Unless they're scared about opposition coaches using the info to tailor their game plans?

They should have a survey on there as well, so the fans can vote for the team. And another one for which players are worth signing/extending contracts...