JJB - 1-4 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1443 Keef - 1-4 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1448 Lulu - 1-4 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1449 Watch them all get 1 game as it's a nothing game (no offence Salford fans)

JJB - 1-4 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1443 Keef - 1-4 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1448 Lulu - 1-4 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1449 Watch them all get 1 game as it's a nothing game (no offence Salford fans)

Good to see that part of the disciplinary process works properly.

Webb is lucky, but he's not a dirty player so I don't mind him getting let off.

My money is on 2 for JJB, sin-bin-sufficient for Keef and 1 for Lulu.

JJB - 1
Keef - sin sin suff
Lulu - no case to answer.

Lulu's depends on the camera angle they have on it. Sky didn't show it again. There can be no doubting it was high though because of the damage you could see on Graham's face after it.

JJB warning letter or small fine
senior sin bin sufficient
kylie warning letter

it is leeds after all

I don't recall many opposition coaches complaining quite so vociferously about our tactics in the way they have done about your mob this year.

In fact, none at all have, including Potter on Friday night.

all 3 are Grade C offences, so if they are found guilty it is a mandatory 1 game ban (max 4 games). Obviously they could be found not guilty.

Leeds are an outstanding side, they should not have to resort to those tactics. I hope the players concerned get there just deserts, anything else just confirms tht the so called "Big" clubs are treated differently than others.

thats sour grapes though,look at the disciplinary hearings..........nothing!


interesting to see that in the last 3 months lee smith,senior,kylie,jamie-jones and lauitititi seem to be serial offenders!

I can't help but think this is being blown up a bit by Grahams reaction. He copped a couple of shots, yes, but he basically invited more on himself because he didn't man it all that well.

Leeds, and other sides for that matter, now know you can get under his skin. Could you imagine Morley having a toy and pram moment like Graham did? You could smash him square in the face and he'd probably just laugh at you.

Fact is opposition coaches have been so incensed by your teams "tactics" that they have risked RFL sanction by speaking out against them, very vociferously.

Nobody has ever done so against us, including Potter on friday.

yes, some highly strung posters on RLFans have got their knickers in a twist and over reacted but when respected individuals within the game like Morgan and Noble complain about dirty tactics I for one pay a lot more heed.

So, whilst you're in that glass house I'd put ths stones down.

Graham's reaction? Don't you think the Leeds fans are in danger of blowing that out of all proportion? You laud Morley as if he's a god but if anyone had done what JJB and Lulu did to Graham to Morley, he would have retaliated by trying to smash them, and probably spent 2 months nursing a broken cheekbone like when he tried to get O'Carroll back or been sent off. Graham didn't lower his standards by retaliating and getting sent off, he just shook his head at Lulu and walked away. If you ask me that is far more the 'big man' than waiting for a chance to get a cheap shot in like a couple of the Leeds players were doing at the end of the game.

And the difference between Friday and Huddersfield's season is that the SL coaches aren't concerned with violent play by the Giants, but a technical naughtiness in constantly holding down and slowing the game, hence the lack of disciplinary action against the Giants this year.

rubbish.
there's a difference between a losing coach whining because his tactics and game plan was nulified by another coach and team and trying to deliberatley injure opposition players which is what leeds did on friday

He didn't retaliate, no. He carried on at the ref and gesticulated his clear unhappiness. He let his emotions get the better of him and singled himself out to the opposition as someone who they should perhaps carrying on at.

Morley is no God. He's not one for crying to the ref either or clearly letting everyone know how upset he is. The best way to answer it all is to just run right back at them as hard and fair as you can.

It's kind of like your peurile dig regarding the supposed tactics at Huddersfield. It's transparent, it just shows that you're annoyed.

how can you tell with that ugly fecker





i thought lulu's was the worse as it was pre-meditated,he knew what he was doing.
JJB was attempting to 'turtle' him but got it wrong and was reckless. i expect a ban.
if senior gets a ban then i expect leeds to produce a dvd off every punch thrown this season and the fact very few gets punished. a fine i would think

Well they should have plenty of footage of Peacock playing!

thats my point. and to be fair he isn't the only one. there have been plenty of other players this season too.
perhaps the fact wilkin collapsed like a soft tart didn't help

Jamie Peacocks in trouble then!

like i said he had a few mad moments early on as well as a few others.

What a load of Cock and Bull , Morley doesnt retaliate to people trying to put big hits on him even if they are illegal hits, and you dont need to look any further than last Saturdays game at Hull KR for proof

Is Cunningham not up before the beak for his swinging arm?

Genuine enquiry

Cunningham is RL royalty and you should be hung for treason.

100% correct, as i said on the saints board, Graham has now made himself a target for every prop with half the skill to have a pop at knowing it can get under his skin

Gilmour, a warning letter for retaliating; throwing punches because of a high tackle. Whilst Smith gets formal warning. Something wrong there....