Realistically, taking form/attitude/injures/bad coaching and all the other factors that can affect results, what would your SL table look like based only on squad potential or expectations

(for example bradford should be higher maybe 7/8th IMO, and Quins about 10th)

thanks

On potential? Saints by a long way given the youngsters who have stepped in and outplayed senior SL players.

Purely on Squad potential

Saints
Leeds
Warrington
Hull
Huddersfield
Wigan
Castleford
Catalans
Bradford
Hull KR
Harlequins
Wakefield
Salford
Celtic

We have some truly world class players in our squad and through a combination of poor coaching and injuries we have suffered alot the last couple of years. Rovers on the other hand have an okay squad and have got to where they are now through good coaching and work ethic/team spirit.

Next year we will have a squad to match the best sides but whether Agar can get the best out of them is another question.

What a pointless thread.

Salford 7th - with over half the squad under 21.

Sheesh.

Prat

Saints
Leeds
Wigan
Hull FC
Wire
Hull KR
Bradford
Quins
Hudds
Catalans
Cas
Wakey
Salford
Celtic

Surely the existing league table is a good indicator of potential, isn't it?

I was thinking the same.

What about some other threads.

If your team had not lost any games where would you be in the table



If your team played to its potential where would you be in the table.



If it was not for injuries which teams would be where in the table.



If refereeing decisions had gone your way what would the SL table look like.

Exactly.

OMG this is such a Pommy concept this thread!

Cougars!

now lock it!!!