Time to get rid

What would the decisions have been without them?

Until ALL games get the same coverage , and they won't then, it is an disadvantage to all teams.

Benefit of the doubt, human error.

It's a sport, not a game for robots

Hawk-Eye has greatly improved Cricket & Tennis IMO...

I repeat Robots!

Obviously video refs are a great innovation..............









.....when their decisions go your way.

I didn't see anything wrong with any of the decisions made . The only biff i have with VR is the time the decisions are taking and that they are not in use at all games.
I also think "Refs' call" should be used.

Ive never been a huge fan of that, normally decisions are clear cut, i dont care what anyone says if you look close enough. If a decision cant be made, benefit of doubt to the attack. I dont see how a ref who saw it once has a better idea than someone who couldnt decide with multiple views.
On the note about at every game, some go for you , some against..i dont see why having the technology is such a big advantage as all the teams know the rules

the thing that annoys me is when they look at something about 20 times and then disallow the try, surely if they need to keep looking there is doubt and benefit of the doubt should be given.

not necessarily rovers, i personally think most decisions are obvious and a lot of the time people have rose tinted specs on, whether it be club colours, love of the underdog, hate the french et al but if you take them off a decision based on the actual rules can be made 19/20

Saying that, The touch judge was closer to anything for Sharps dis-aloud try. Why didn't Ganson confer with his college first ?.

I don't know to be honest, maybe the touch judge gave the indication he hadnt seen it properly?? i dont know, but then again this is about VR's as opposed to whether a ref consults his colourful mates with the flags enough

Why would he confer with his college?

Because he was no fewer than a meter away.

If VR's were at every game, then fair enothe but untill then im against them. The way they go over the replays again and again makes me sick, IMO the VR should only be allowed to see the play at full speed and if no evidence is conculsive BOTD should be given.

I don't see how it affects you? When was the last time Keighley was on the telly?

Never ever seen upto now this season, a touch judge do [uanything[/u.
So perhaps we should get rid of them and replace them with video refs at every game.

About 3 weeks ago

nrl video refs at everygame

Clearly, because he felt he needed further education.