But you'd throw out life's rule book if she did wouldn't you?

I'd refer it upstairs to the video wife.

Except when a Halifax player does it in the Semi-Final of the NRC

He didn't knock on. He threw it away

Gleeson didn't throw it away. He knocked on, ran over the ball and then ran back and picked it up. Then you scored a try. We didn't hear such a tough stance from you then, did we?

Referee didn't think so and he sees everything. I didn't see it. I only see things that i want to. Things like this don't register with my brain. Mind you, the dirty thuggy cowardly things that Toa-Kohe Love gets away with kinda evens these injustices out.

Pathetic decision. Not the first time it's happened this year aswell.

Ganson is a ****.

At least you can't say that Ganson is biased for Saints.

There was also an earlier incident, pass goes to Wilken who can,t catch it goes backwards over his shoulder, knock on scrum to Warrington.

High tackle bursts Grix mouth open.

Play on.............................

Thats what I thought, they were almost saying the knock on should be ignored because it was a great run!

Yea that was a bizarre one.

this is the same set of numpties that have advocated some tries being worth moe than other depending on how good they look though.

It looked nothing on Sky. The contact with the mouth was so quick you couldn't see it clearly even on slo-mo. No doubt that he did make contact but it was hardly a classic hit shot, more of a flailaing arm.

We were watching a different game then...

If Ganson says that ball didnt touch Roby before Carvell regathered then he shouldnt video ref anymore. If another offence occured resulting in a play on after it hit Roby then fair enough!

(Take nowt from Carvell though, he played to the whistle and ran it in for the try of his life. )

Maybe eddie was right the RFL now do video ref decisions based on morality not fact

I was a retarded decision, i dont know how ganson could not see the ball being knowed on into roby two if not three times

Althouigh it was ganson so maybe he does not know the rules after all

"Technically a knock on, but morally it should be a try"

What???

A low point in commentating history, surely.

Bit harsh on yourself there pal perhaps?

But I agree with your post. Do they still do that 'ask Cummings' thing on Boots n All (Not watched it in years)? It would be good to get a referee's viewpoint/justification for that.

We watched it with a Wire fan or three and they weren't getting excited even when Carvell was on his crazed dash, they all spotted it in real time and were convinced when they replayed it. One of the replays in particular had the knock on count about on par with the scoreline at the time. The correct decision was a knock on against Roby and a scrum to Warrington.

As it was Ganson - maybe he was drunk?

He was definately disorderly.

Totally cringeworthy comment, time for Wiggy to hang up his mic.

He fully deserved the try in my opinion and it would have been a travesty if it was not given for whats was impossible to see which direction the ball was travelling and who it was hitting.

Reward brilliance, not pedantic rule followers.

Forget the decision, where did Carvell get that pace from!!!

Get a drugs test on him, he was lightning!