Phil Clarke bursting out of his shirt

Can understand where Agar is coming from with regards the penalty count despite the Sky team knocking him. Was it really a dirty/penalty ridden game? Too many pedantic unnecessary getting involved for the sake of it calls by Child for me.

Yeah but he let you win the game with a ridiculous forward pass.

What forward pass? If you mean the one Alex Sutcliffe threw that Myler picked up and scored from then it did go backwards first...that it took a bounce forward after it hit the ground is irrelevant, it went backwards first so play on.

Ball went forward, the bounce was three or four yards ahead of where he passed it from. Never been one to say if we would've won or lost from a decision like that but it was forward.

Do you really believe it wasn't a forward pass?

At least that play was like watching the Leeds of old.

Yes, take the desperate for Leeds to lose specs off. Went backwards originally, that it bounced forwards after hitting the ground is irrelevant if you learn the rules:

No it want learn the rules

It has nothing to do with me desperately wanting Leeds to lose, I couldn't give a monkeys, it's more to do with your blue & amber specs, it didn't go backwards at any time.

You claimed the bounce took it forward when it's plain to see the pass was thrown on the 15 metre mark and it landed just before the 10 metre mark and the bounce highlighted it. And if you can't come up with anything other than learn the rules then don't bother replying.

Oh come on. It went forward and then bounced even further forwards. I think you know that

how embarrassing seeing that forward pass being allowed, its not as clear cut though as the stains try that was given what was double movement

I'll come up learn the rules when you actually bother to learn them. I don't necessarily agree with the momentum rule but it clearly comes out of his hands backwards and Alex Sutcliffe ends up ahead of the ball where it lands. It's a try any day of the week under the current rules we go by week in week out.....if the rules are changed then fair enough, but until that day don't say something isn't a try when it clearly is under current rules.

Well we"ll have to agree to differ given I don't think it did and given your patronising response best to leave it there.

I'm not being patronising I'm just pointing out the rules whether people like the rules or not. You say look at where the ball is thrown I say look at where Alex Sutcliffe is when the ball lands....if you're being honest he's at least 2/3m ahead of where the ball lands, it's the momentum rule whether people hate that rule or not. If they change the rule then fair enough but until then that's play on and a try,

I went as a neutral and it was highly embarrassing to see the Leeds fans all around me getting all giddy at the end over a narrow win over a bottom of the table outfit. They used to behave like that in the days when they used to win trophies (remember them?)

But I suppose it was a big relegation 4 pointer for their 'Rotten Club' (copyright Kevin Sinfield) so perhaps they can be excused a touch.

Their songs doesn't get any better either. Constant football and cricket chants yet again. Do they have any of their own?

London were never leading in the game, they weren't robbed etc. 2 poor teams trying their best, I enjoyed it.

Even when we’re sh|t some opposition fans are still bitter

Well it was like old days in that we were playing at the ground of a big name football team and came out victorious when a lot of neutrals were desperate to see us lose

No you are not pointing out the rules. There’s no such thing as the momentum rule. Momentum is physics.
And it was a forward pass.

Cricket chants ?

the games is turning into a farce with idiot comments like yours desperate to win at all cost,
no wonder there's more controversial decisions talked about whether its a try or not, slow mo tv shows them up clearly with even pundits embarrassed to say it shouldn't of been

It is a very obvious forward pass.

Not desperate to win at all cost, let’s be honest if Londonhad scored that try then all the “neutrals” wouldn’t have a problem with the pass. That’s all it is here that they wanted a Leeds loss.

The fact that most neutrals wanted London to win is irrelevant. The pass was a mile forward and should have been spotted by the officials.