Thats a rather long winded way of saying nowhere

You didn't answer the question properly, dont know if you mis-read the question or ignored it. Will you support teams from PNG or Perth being the next teams into the NRL?

Most of NSW and Queensland is the answer. RU is biggest in ACT and AFL is biggest in Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia. Northern Territory is close between RL and AFL

Worse than that, Tasmania has no rugby league played there at all, not even at an amateur level.

I know that Tasmania isn't the most significant place on the planet but even so, if league has pretensions to be the "national sport of Australia", it is pretty poor that one state has no rugby league at all.

But the biggest two media outlets do.
I dont know an awful lot about their state but I get the impression League shouldnt stand still and become stale over there

so you were serious then?

maybe youve misread this thread

go back to where i wrote down my views twice.

you guys arent setting any intellectual benchmarks here

All of NSW and all of queensland.

All of ACT too.

not bad. at least one person from the other side of the fence has some idea about RL. maybe you should be the president and spokesperson for the mob

Maybe that will help him. We have a new one now though for the list of hypocrisy...

RL is most dominant in NSW (need more teams) vs RL not very dominant in France (need more teams)

a tasmanian NRL team?





whose going to watch them, all the trees.

the NRL is actually an international competition.

53% of australias population resides in nsw and queensland.
47% of our population lives in the rest.

demographic trends show queensland has the highest population growth rate and will overtake victoria within 2 decades in terms of population

in terms of advertising dollars on TV, RL areas comprise 65% of the total advertising spent, whilst the rest generates the residual.

As is Super Legaue

given im arguing for more French SL teams i think ive worked that one out

thanks for the help though, great contribution!

Would someone like to point out where an NRL team for Tasmania was mentioned before he goes off on another tangent to run away from his previous hypocrasies?

And also that no-one said any different about NRL not being in more than one nation.

Dodging the questions still.

Quote ="Wellsy13"Do you have a link for when Wood said about the NRC winners and Grand Final winners being allowed to apply? I can't find it.'" There's a reference to it halfway down this link from the official SL website.... www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=14771

Quote ="Wellsy13"Do you have a link for when Wood said about the NRC winners and Grand Final winners being allowed to apply? I can't find it.'" There's a reference to it halfway down this link from the official SL website.... www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=14771

I find it strange that you claim to be in favour of expansion but you refuse to say yes or no to a simple question about expansion in your own Country.

I guess people are correct in calling you a hyporcrit. Or maybe they are giving you too much credit. when in fact all you are is a troll who dosent really care about expansion in either country and your just on here to wind people up who are passionate about Rugby League.

I didn't say that they should have an NRL team. I said that it is a glaring fact that there is no RL played there at all, even at an amateur level.

That's pretty poor.

It's not much better in SA either and we are about to lose NT to AFL lock, stock and barrell. NRL isn't shown on FTA pre midnight to 47% of the country, AFL is shown live to 100% of the country. NRL has regular games in 50% of Australian capital cities, AFL next year will have regular games in EVERY capital city. You figure out which can consider itself more national!

For all Dally's posturing about about being pro expansion he thinks the next two teams in the NRL need to be a NSW team and a Q'land team. Not hard to make up your own minds about how pro expansion he is.

Bit like saying yes we need Toulouse and Paris but lets get Widnes and Leigh in first to strengthen the heartlands.

This is the part he cannot get his head around. He genuinely cannot see why he is a hypocrit. And he probably won't reply to that because it spells it out too much to be able to defend.

More or less yes. Probably a few posh suburbs prefer RU and maybe a few border places with Victoria prefer AFL, but seems a fair generalisation.


Not so sure Brumbies seem to get much bigger crowds than Canberra Raiders, but not sure which is cumulatively higher as Raiders play more games

So you havent a clue what you are talking about , you have no information other than this message board and the press , you have no idea about Toulouse or Paris , you are a wind up merchant and nothing more

Bye

i find it strange you dont read properly.

whoosh!

yes people that rely upon the hearsay of a couple of people on the street dont know what they are talking about

so widnes and leigh are like queensland and central coast

TV viewers included and RL destroys em