=#FF0000How many neutrals attend a RL fixture & why would they suddenly support an expansion team over a well known team ? Is it just because YOU WANT THEM TO ?

Ave u evor bin 2 Skool ?

So you've based your calculations on incomplete figures, no doubt incomplete because you wanted/needed/desired to massage them !
Which year have you taken your incomplete figures from ?

Is this argument with a Wakey fan "unwinnable" because you want it to be a 'who can shout loudest & longest' game ?

You sunshine are like a third nipple, a bit gross & nobody wants one !

No I haven't......I have repeatedly answered it but as the answer wasn't the one you wanted, you repeat the question.......I said earlier.



4,000 home fans at Wakefield meaning 350 or so visitors.......rattling around a decrepit stadium....and you want to talk about atmosphere? Oh the Irony.....


Modern PROFESSIONAL sport is about MONEY. The major sports make most of their money from TV and as such, spectators become secondary......be they home or away fans......if RL wants to stay trapped with 6 teams fro either side of the pennines and sod the rest then fine, but don't be shocked when sky don't bother next time and we end up with a pittance of a TV deal.....because Wakefield v Castleford isn't going to interest anyone other than those who already know about the game.........the current capacity at BV is gven as 9,300....was there a bus strike on the day of this years derby......because there were 2,000+ unsold tickets for the "local derby" that you claim is the lifeblood of the sport.

Don't wrap your fear of expansion in some sort of crusade about the impact of Toulouse displacing widnes at Magic weekend......that's the RFL's problem, not Wakefields.....you just fear that your club will be jettisoned in favour of another expansionist franchise.....and I believe you have every right to be afraid

You don't need 10,000+ supporters for an "atmosphere". The Shay was rocking last weekend for the TO game, with less than 2000 in the ground and virtually no TO fans (I didn't see any at all). Add in a few hundred away supporters and then you've got a real "event".

You focus on the money, and I'm more interested in the supporter who turns up week in week out (as will be the case for Leigh on Sunday). Between us we maybe should get it right??!!

2018.....and they're incomplete because Wigan hadn't hosted Catalan util now and Wakey haven't annunced their gate v Catalan (not that I can find anyway)


Nope. It is based purely on mathematics......the SL kitty gives Wakefield £1,800,000.......1 game where Catalan bring no fans costs Wakefield £10,000 at most and the figure bandied about by SL chairmen a few years back was a £4 million turn over to run a club at no loss.....£10,000 shouldn't be a issue to any top flight club.


Bless. When you rattle the cage of a Northern Monkey it throws sh$7 at you......and you my son, have just proven that!

The trouble with northerners is that they are so used to mediocrity being so second nature to them, that any outsiders who can see the mediocrity and make a statement are shot down and ridiculed. If some are sooo happy with crowds of 2000 then please, never seek Super League. Be content where you are down there. This is one of the biggest blind spots RL in northern England has! Other parts of the UK don't!! So frustrating.

I’ve been reading this debate with interest.

There’s no doubt that if you replace Catalan with either Wigan or Hull then the semi final attendance would be larger. Frankly though Leeds v Warrington should be packing the stadium on their own.

The question we really need to ask is why do we need to have a double header in the first place? The answer for me is that rugby league is going stale and is under funded. We are, in reality a M62 corridor sport plus Catalan which has the beginning of a foothold elsewhere that is yet to be exploited.

Reading through threads like this (an I’m no exception to this) those who argue against expansion are often supporters of clubs perceived to be at risk from a Toronto or Tolouse coming into SL and those in favour often a supporter of a ‘bigger’ side.

For me, for this sport to progress we need new blood, we need a fresh influx of players from new areas and we need the potential money that new markets can introduce to the sport. The key is we exploit those markets which hopefully the new CEO of SL will be able to do.

In truth the development of players and introducing new supporters will take time and we have to allow for this. I say this with genuine regret and empathy for their supporters but if we end up loosing a club with 100+ years of tradition to try and progress the sport then is is a sacrifice worth making as something needs to be done.

Long term, if we can increase revenue there’s no reason we can’t aim to have a thriving 20 team SL, going back to the original point, if that was the case it wouldn’t matter which teams are in the semifinals, we would then have enough interest to fill the stadium.

Finally, a balanced viewpoint, rather than the "blind folded, fingers crossed brigade".

The Irony......oh the Irony


You started this thread with a hardly veiled swipe at the Expansionist Clubs. You "assumed" that as there were tickets on offer at a discount that this was because Catalan were one of the 4 sides and chose to focus on the "away fans" as an aside.

I gave you my viewpoint that whilst I trusted little that came out of the Toronto PR machine, we've had 130+ years to sort out the mess that the game is and why not try something new. I gave you my viewpoint, shared by many sports writers and journalists, that fans in the stadium is becoming less important in this ever changing multi-media market and I also repeated that the reality is that the away fans for a game at a local club like Wakefield are worth an average of less than £10,000 and that the lower gates at events have NO impact on anyone other than the RFL.....

But because my viewpoint doesn't fit with your anti-expansionist/fear of something different/protect my club at all costs agenda, you say it's blind folded finger crossing......point of order here, you don't know why ticket sales are slow, if they even are, for the double header, but you have repeated your opinion multiple times with no evidence to support it...... but I can show you using simple arithmetic that away fans are a red herring that play little roll in the running of a professional sports club or the RFL's coffers. I've also explained that neither semi finals in 2005 when Toulouse v Leeds attracted 10,553 or 2007 when Catalan attracted 10,218 attracted such a thread decrying expansionists.......in fact, the Catalan gate was almost identical at the HJ stadium as the one 2 years later between St Helens and Huddersfield......see, I use facts to counter your opinion and at every turn, you lose the debate, because you are simply put, anti-exansionist, because you fear for your clubs future if Super League were ever to actually become SUPER.

5,000 missing Catalan fans is worth 100k to the RFL........On a £25,000,000 turn over that's a pittance. 350 missing Catalan fans at Wakefield is worth £7,000 in lost revenue to Wakefield.......again, a fraction of a %......away fans don't matter.

And off we go again.

Whether fans matter and you seem to think that they dont is a huge part of the question.
As someone who misses maybe 3 games a season (home or away), I believe the balance has shifted way too far away from the paying public.
I realise that without TV/Sponsorship, we cannot enjoy professional sport and far from being anti expansionist, I've been quite the opposite, although this doesnt seem to fit with your "northern pit village" rhetoric



Although I couldnt make the away fixture in Perpignan this season, a group of us went to Toulouse this season and we always attended the away fixtures in London and Wales so, perhaps you should adjust your thoughts slightly.

The original post did question whether Catalan being one of the 4 semi finalists was the main reason behind poor ticket sales and whilst you considered this to be a "loaded" post, it s seemed a fair question.

We then get slurs on Trinity and its fans, pit village comments etc rather than any acknowledgement that there could be future issues with attendances for future RL events.

Fundamentally, you may have shown that any monetary loss is negligible, however, as a life long fan of the game, I find it difficult to accept that we would rather watch our game in half empty stadia because money is the driving force of the game, rather than looking after the sports paying customers.

Once we have a sanitised sport, laid on for the corporate elite instead of the regular fans, we no longer have a sport.

So what is it that you actually want to see from the sport?

It we take the general view that the sport is struggling to compete in this marketplace (given that we seem to be losing a greater proportion of top talent to overseas competitions, that we struggle to attract quality overseas talent (at least, ones that aren't banned from other comps), that participation is falling, that crowds are falling and the average age of our audience is going up), then a key challenge to addressing those issues is getting more finance into the game.

Now without turning the sport into a "sanitised corporate sport" that you seem to disaprove off, that would leave the sport needing to generate more finance from its supporter base. If that is the case, do you believe that the supporter base can contribute more? I would suggest that there is enough evidence out there to suggest that it can't (or won't) - we struggle to sell out key events, and the supporter base often isn't interested in events unless the tickets are sold at rock-bottom prices.

Or is the issue simply that you don't want the sport to address those issues, or that you don't believe the sport is facing those challenges? Is it simply a case that you don't want the sport to stray "out of its comfort zone", to remain something of a Northern oddity, simply because some clubs will be less equipped to meet the new standards than others?

Over the years I have been on RL fans there have been numerous threads about what the clubs and fans should be doing to market the sport - putting on events, fan engagement, community engagement, ancillary attractions, quality merchandise, etc. Toronto are doing all of these things, and making it work, yet for some on here that's still not enough. It just seems to me that people would much rather see the sport fail simply to see Toronto fail, rather than encouraging anything that drives this sport forward.

Nobody is saying that we want empty stadia - that isn't appealing to anyone and again, I believe you're seeing this as an either/or scenario. This isn't about forgetting the supporter base to chase the coporate dollar. It's about developing the fan base to make it and the sport more attractive to the commercial world.

And just a point about atmospheres, some of the best atmosphere's I've seen watching Leeds have been during the WCC events - not many Melbourne, Canterbury or Manly supporters in the crowd from what I recall of those nights.

What do I want as a fan of RL ?

Fairly simple answer, To be able to watch two evenly matched sides compete in a game of RL at a decent standard.
There is no secret that I am a Trinity fan and proud of it and for the record, although the "facilities" at some grounds were poor, the viewing of the game back in the day, when most fans had the opportunity to find their preferred viewpoint on the terraces AND be able to move freely around the grounds (both home and away) was significantly better than being forced to sit in a plastic seat, with little leg room and be constantly "hassled" by the constant stream of drinkers and toilet goers (usually the drinkers).
Of course the facilities at the newer grounds are far better than the old with, refreshments, toilets etc much improved but, much has been lost from "the good old days".
A decent view of the game and some chat with other supporters also adds to the matchday experience.

Of course, Rugby League has to compete with other sports to "entice" players into the sport and reward them for their efforts and therein lies the problem.

Our main "competition" for athletes who want to play league is perceived to come from Union, a sport that is far more wealthy than RL and probably always will be.
Union is played in good numbers across most of the UK and due to the history of the game, will remain dominant over our game. Before Union came clean and went professional, we were able to attract some great players into our code but, this pathway, although not officially closed, is no longer viable on anything other than an occasional "token" convert, Gareth Thomas being the last high profile signing.

Therefore, we are left paddling our own canoe, trying to develop our own, which ultimately is restricting "organic" growth and despite some efforts to "spread the gospel", we remain a marginalised sport, played mainly along the M62 corridor.

The expansion into into France, with PSG which was partially to raise the profile of the sport, was initially a spectacular flop (depspite the 10,000 attendance for their opening game) however, their replacement with Catalan, who you could say are from the "Heartlands in Catalonia" has certainly worked up to a point and with Toulouse now challenging for a spot in the top flight, this will help to strengthen RL in France and hopefully, in Europe and we should embrace this.

We then move along to N. America.

Encouraged by Nigel Wood Toronto have put together a squad of largely overseas players and spent their way to the top of League 1 and then to the top of The Championship and will more than likely replace Widnes in SL, unless of course their is a further restructure of the competition or, a breakaway of some sort.

There are several issues with the N. American club.
Firstly, there is little doubt that they have added some "X Factor" to both League 1 and The Championship and brought some publicity to the game. However, whilst they may have some local players in their squad, this remains a RL club built on sand and running at a substantial monetary loss since their inception and this should be ringing alarm bells everywhere.
Their consortium seem happy to bank roll them but, seriously, for how long ?
Equally, there isnt a hope in hell of them producing more than an odd one or two SL players for the foreseeable future.
So whilst some see this as the "Great RL Dream" (and cracking the N. American market would be one hell of a feather in Mr Wood's cap, a couple of tough seasons, especially if they were in a position to be relegated would end very badly.
It's a HUGE gamble and as we've seen with Koucash and more recently Beaumont, wealthy people are generally happy when they are getting the results that they want and why should Toronto be any different.
I've posted many times about including both Toulouse and Toronto in the top flight but, also that this should be done in an expanded SL (14 clubs) as it would be criminal to allow say 2 current SL sides fold to test Mr Woods dream.
The game is short on cash, no doubt but Toronto will likely be a drain on limited resources, rather than a contributor but, so many dreamers are happy to close their eyes and just hope.

So basically you are OK with expansion so long as it's not at the expense of your club.......

Lol at the wakefield fan claiming totonto are only where they are because they spent. If you listened to him you would think the likes of Man City, man united, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Melbourne storm, toulon rugby club, Philadelphia eagles, New England patriots and golden state warriors all got to where they are without spending a pennY. Wakefield are the perfect example of a club who are skint and therefore want to stop the rest of the league spending

Regards

King James

You could so easily apply this criticism to those who believe that we can address the game's challenges by "focusing on the heartlands".

My fear is that unless something happens to inject finance into the sport, the sport is going to find it harder and harder to deliver what you and I think most supporters want - an entertaining, competitive sport played to a high standard. In order to do that, the game needs the funds to address issues such as grass roots development, the real-terms cut in the salary cap that we've seen over the last 20 years, and the ability to develop, retain and attract players.

But from your posts on this issue, you don't seem comfortable with that injection of finance coming from trying to court commercial partners (it will make the sport sterile), you appear to think that the opportunity cost of exploring opportunities overseas is too great (and despite your "dreamers" swipe, I haven't seen any pro-expansion comment that doesn't ackowledge the risks), and your view is simply that we should focus on the heartlands even though there is enough evidence already to suggest that the heartlands aren't exactly fertile soil for new supporters, new players and new sources of funding.

The last few years we have seen a trend of games becoming less competitive (the average winning margin has increased for each of the last three years, and the number of games won by a margin or one score less has decreased in the same period) and, whilst the standard and entertainment value is subjective, I'd argue that those have fallen. In other words, you aren't getting what you want to see but at the same time, you're coming across as resistant to any change in the sport despite the fact that every other sport around us has changed to reflect changes in the modern sports environment.

I don't believe that Toronto and North America are the panacea to these problems, but I think that they're the best option at this point in time. The heartlands clubs, with very few exceptions, have demonstrated that they aren't capable of taking the sport forward.

And at this point, I'd lock this thread because it has been argued and shown that whilst Toronto may not be the answer, they and other expansion clubs are the best option we have now and the heartlands just don't care enough about our sport anymore.

Wakefield, a club with 145 years of history and a founder of the Northern Union can't attract any more than 4,000 people to games and IMHO, should no longer be permitted to hold the sport back, whilst clubs like Hull, Warrington, St Helens, Wigan, Leeds and Catalans strive for better performance both on and off the field. Whether you believe the hyperbole coming from Toronto or not (8,000 in their dreams maybe), they are worth a punt, because they didn't exist 2 years ago and are injecting passion into the game, whilst Wakefield seem to have lost close to 1,000 fans per game in 12 months.......no wonder the OP is afraid!
And in case this is taken as a pop solely at Wakey, the same goes for Widnes, Salford and once Ken Davy has had enough, Huddersfield....Castleford and HKR are heading in the right direction but should be monitored closely and Castleford do need a new stadium which will see them flourish like Wire have at HJ.

Same here: I'm ok with expansion so long as it's not at the expense of his club.

Binning one club to give a leg up to another isn't expansion, it's merely a glorified P&R.

Clubs treading water/treating survival as a victory is killing the sport. As I say, Toronto and expansion might not be the answer, but Wakefield is definitely not!

The problem is, that it shouldn't be about heartlands versus expansion, it should be both together. How they can work and move the sport onwards side by side. Progressing the sport. There are people on here who think it should be Toronto or Wakefield for example,When what it really should be is Toronto AND Wakefield.

Your right, the finances into the sport need to be improved. And as much as clubs are to be blamed for just hoping rather than promoting. The RFL can also be blamed, for a lack of a media push, a lack of getting the sport out there. The Eddie stobart deal so devalued the sport. They set it back years. In my opinion (and I know other won't agree), the franchise system did nothing to help. A league were nothing happens doesn't push a sport forward. The consent arguing for who gets the money, makes the sport seem petty. We don't do enough to make the sport come across in a good light. And until there's a proper international calender we will be seen as a small club sport. Which makes the whole sport harder to market.

We're always going to struggle to retain players. We all know that the Nrl is the best league, so of course we're always going to lose players to there. If you want to be the best, you have to play the best. And the fact that RU has such an international calender, means that players who want more than just a small club game, are going to go there.

Your totally right about the grass roots. The lack of funding and help we give them compared to say football is disgusting. But we also need to give young players a clear route to success. And that to me is academy, reserves 1st team. Who wants to play for 4 clubs on DR, or play in a sport were you might not get a game for weeks on end. To bring the best you have to show them how they're going to succeed and become one of your best.

You could argue that the standards aren't falling, but the players are getting better. But to me the games becoming boring. More sides are going for the 5 drives and a kick approach. Trying to win/milk penalties to move them down the pitch. Scoring off kicks, rather than spontaneous play. This isn't helped by coache's constantly going on about completing sets, doing the basics etc. If the product on the pitch isn't great, crowds aren't going to come flocking in. And long term fans get bored and choose there games to go to.
Plus the changes in society don't help our sport. The fact that there's so much football, and things to do without leaving the house. So little money avaliable to the average person, less time to relax. We're a working class sport predominantly and if they can't come there's no one to fill that void. Add in the money and Domination of football, the age group going to RL gets older. And we're doing very little to attract a younger denigration to the sport.
And if crowds don't come flocking in, then advertising and sponsorship falls. What the answer is I don't know, but something needs to be done.

This is precisely the nub of the entire argument. And it’s entirely the point of the whole debate.
I’m absolutely in favour of expansion. I agree totally with all the arguments in favour of Toronto, Toulouse etc etc. I think it’s a really exciting time for rugby league. But you and other posters have all acknowledged that we don’t know if Toronto (especially Toronto) will be a success, yet you think it’s worth a punt and it’s worth jeopardising the existence of clubs like Wakefield, Salford, Widnes etc.
Well, the history of expansion clubs isn’t too encouraging is it - Paris, Gateshead, Wrexham, Cardiff, Scarborough, Mansfield...... So, we ditch the clubs that are ‘holding the game back’ but the great North American dream crashes and burns. What do we have then? Oh yes a professional game comprising Wigan, Saints, Warrington, Leeds, Hull and Catalans. We could probably engineer Bradford, Toulouse and London in there too along with Cas. A ten team SL with the rest of the game dying on its ar5e. Even if Toronto succeeds (and I seriously hope it does) and more N American teams also come on board why do you think that it has to be at the expense of existing clubs? Why can’t we have expansion AND strong heartlands clubs? That’s the fundamental question facing the game. At the moment it doesn’t have an answer and neither do you. Rugby league can’t afford to lose a single club and all your statistics and passionate arguments are worth diddly if we jettison clubs and follow your preferred strategy because the game will lose its history, its heart, its soul and its very reason for existing.

But you’re not anti Wakefield???
And how do you know that Trinity aren’t ‘the answer’? If we’d been having this discussion back in 1980 you’d have been saying Wigan were part of the problem and Widnes were one of the teams we should be looking up to. Ten years ago it would have been Bradford. As you say, Toronto might not be the answer but don’t kid yourself that you definitely know what the answer is.

I can't speak for others on here but I personally don't believe that expansion has to be an either/or scenario. Yes, you have to set a limit of clubs in the top division at some point, but this isn't about ditching the loyal and faithful wife for a 21 year old blonde with bigger boobs.

What it is about is raising standards and raising the bar in terms of what clubs need to do to grow the sport, market the sport and themselves, and reach new audiences. What I think many who are against TW are most fearful of is that they set a standard that their club can't reach.

As I said earlier, there are some on here for whom nothing that TW does will ever be enough. If they pull in big crowds, those crowds are "exaggerated" and they've been counting the pixels on their TV screen to prove it. If they engage new, younger audiences, those fans are "only there for a beer festival". And if they attract big sponsors, that won't matter because they "don't bring any away fans".

TW have done everything that could have been asked of them in less than 2 years. For some their concern isn't about the state of RL, it's a fear that TW may set a standard that their club doesn't have the ambition or ability to reach.

That’s fine, couldn’t agree more. Clubs come and go and, if they can’t reach the required standards, on the field or off, they must find the level at which they can function. I just get the feeling that that’s not what some posters on here are advocating.

FWIW I agree with you (to a large degree anyway), I just fear for them if their benefactor pulls out as they have nothing to support them otherwise.

Btw, maybe it was the microphones in use at the game, but when the guy on the tannoy asked the crowd to "make some noise" it did sound like the Toronto faithful had been rudely awakened from their private conversations. I guess it's down to the way fans support their team, but the Canadians do seem very quiet!!