9 wins in Hull's last 25 home games.................

11 wins from the last 15 away games isn't too shabby though.

Ward made a weak London side competitive for a full season which is no mean feat.
What we don't know is whether he's capable of getting the most from his key players as he didn't really have any stand outs around which to develop his team further.
Any top coach needs to be able to do that. Jury's out on whether Ward could, I guess another question is: can Radford?

So combined it is 20 wins from 40, so a 50% win rate. Pretty poor isn't it given the make up of our squad the last couple of years?

Was the make up of our squad for the last two years that good?

We only just replaced Watts, with Satae at the very end of the last season, we pulled Ellis out of retirement, he'll be better this year, for getting a pre season under his belt. Did Sika Manu and Minichello stay a season too long? Was Jake Connor in a bad patch of form? We brought in Savelio, but he spent the season on the sidelines. And Bowden was nowhere near, after returning from a long lay off with a bad injury.

We still were only 80 minutes from another Wembley final, beaten by the eventual winners. And we missed out on the top 5 on points difference.

And this season hasn't started well on the injury front so far. Only 6 players have been ever present so far in the first five games, and one is Jordan Lane, who probably wouldn't make our first 17. Our new second row of Ma'u and Jones have played once together so far, that was against Leeds away, which we won well.

And, who brought in an injury prone slow winger unwanted by Saints...?

Reading people defend Radford reminds me of Wigan fans that defended Brian Noble.

A bag full of excuses and bad luck and people satisfied with nearly winning something.

Then Madge made Wigan champions with virtually the same squad of players (with the inclusion of Paul Deacon).

If Hull are happy to nearly win something they should stick with Radford.

Reasoned arguments, not excuses.

Sayin "sack the coach" is just to easy to say, it's like "Orange man bad" it's a cop out.

[url=https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/rugby-league-news/hull-fc-form-paul-cooke-3910380Last comment from me on Radders (well, it's Paul Cookes thoughts)[/url Lee isn't the only coach under pressure.

Just because it’s easy to say doesn’t mean it’s not the right thing to do.

There were plenty of reasoned arguments to keep Brian Noble at Wigan but ultimately it’s about winning and with the squads that Radford has had his teams should be doing much better.

It's not that easy to win silverware every year, especially when there's other teams in the league with the same ambitions, and trying just as hard to succeed.

There's only 2 major trophies available to win each year, and there's a good few teams who are capable of winning them. If you think Radford should be doing better, then you must think he's had one of the best two squads of players in the competition for his entire time at Hull?

It doesn't make him a bad coach, just as it doesn't make Wayne Bennett or Trent Robinson bad coaches when they don't have successful seasons.

He's a proven winner. And he's capable of bringing silverware to Hull this season, because he's got previous.

As a Warrington fan, i hope price is 1st to go, i also hope hull stick with radford, hull could be really tasty with a good coach.

Well done to Steve Price and Lee Radford

Sack Powell and Chester.

Also, sack Woolf, he's lost 3 games already. He's taking St's backwards.

Ha ha

do you think that will easy the pressure nearly losing another game when you was cruising

If I thought Radders was looking like he was buckling under any pressure at this stage of the season, then I'd join the Radford out club.

Whats the odds on Radford now, yes they have got injuries but they are very poor, two poor sides in first half but Warrington kicked on in second half.

I don’t mind radford. He’s won a challenge cup and leathered Ryan Bailey so fair play to him

Radford gone, live on sky

Not seen anything like this

Straight after the game!

That's cold man.

Sacking a coach straight after a game. That's mental.

If you think about it, theres been several occasions and results over the last 3 years where it would have been justified in sacking him.

He's been very fortunate really.

Strong leadership from Pearson

Should have happened earlier.