Depends if the direcor concerned is prepared to lose their money which they have loaned. Unless you know that for a fact, then they are very much real debt.

If ONE more Hull v HKR post is placed on this forum then I sugest locking it?

The best we can ever get is that they agree to disagree all the time even nbasics like igo Hull play in Black and white and Rovers in Red and White!!!

FWIW, rovers played in red and blue in 2007. Other fans can't and therefore shouldn't comment on our rivalry really as it IS the ONLY true derby in superleague.

Anyway, I don't know what you're moaning about really, we haven't even got to the "my dads bigger than your dad" part yet!

This Dally chaps a bit of a thicky i must say.

Oh you spoilt it for me now, I was going to introduce that








Others will never have the pleasure of knowing what a real true derby is in rugby league

much like every other SL club which has directors loans.

why dont other SL clubs have similar stories ...

when wakey get relegated next time think of me

yeah exactly like the potential of london.

thats why such a poor london team continues in SL.

the RFL will be way more lenient on a club with expansion potential like salford than wakey

so the SMC make the decision?

thats not what was said above.

why would SMC owners turn down another paying tennant?

does council not want to make a better return on its asset and hence encourage more tenants?

They do, when their finances are published, directors loans are included in the debt figure. Why should HKR be treated any different from ANY OTHER COMPANY, not just RL clubs?

4th time lucky eh?

when you write off a debt like that you have to pay tax on it.

wigan probably did it beause the club was sold to an outside party and it was part of cleaning up the books.

i put money into my company as a directors loans.

its shown as a current liability meaning in theory its payable in 12 months.

thats about as far as the newspaper researched, which is hardly.

unless the debts are owed to parties outside the club, or unless directors want their money back this story is zilch

Here, try this:



There's a section in there on comprehension, ask a grown up to read it to you

if KR moved just their derby game to the KC, that would be a full house rather than 12,000 at craven park ie 12,000 more fans.

12,000 more fans / 12 home games or around that is an increase in the crowd average of the club by 1000.

games against the bigger yorkshire clubs could get more than 12,000 capacity of Craven park

As was said earlier the pitch is only good for a certain amount of games. The people who own the SMC also own Hull City hence they don't want another team damaging the pitch. The council basically have nothing to do with the stadium.

your guesses contain more info than was in the newspaper article.

financial statements do tell you the break up of assets and liabilities.

they come with a set of notes attached which break down the current assets / liabilities, non current assets / liabilities into their larger components

No chance.

Unless you are saying in effect it would be another Hull FC home game with Rovers fans in the North Stand. Rovers haven't the fans to fill the West Stand never mind the East and South as well.

Anyway it's not going to happen so it's a pointless discussion.

so the other 5,000+ fans that turn up on derby day are from where? There is always pelnty of Rovers fans in teh East and South stand not to mention the neutrals that turn up for the "occasion" (who wouldn;t want to see Rovers win another derby game?)

As said its a mute point as A) Rovers fans don;t want it B) Financially it wouldn't be worth much by the time you have paid the SMC fees and lost other game day revenues and C) we'll leave plastic stadiums for plastic clubs thanks!

Not in abbreviated accounts they don't.

Why not spend a few £ on downloading the readily available accounts from Companies House, get someone to read them to you and then come back and give us all the breakdown? So far a couple of qualified accountants on the Hull board and the HDM have failed to find this breakdown information.

well newspaper articles shoudnt be based on abbreviated accounts should they?

from what i read in the link the person that wrote the article sure didnt look further than the abbreviated accounts.

as i said, its a case of poor 1st year accounting

if the paper wants a more accurate analysis they should pay me to look at them and ill write a more accurate article

The abbreviated accounts are all that's available for a company with the turnover of an RL club.

You ought to stop pretending that you know what you're talking about. It's just making you look foolish.

I dont know what the hell you accountants are talking about, but it sure aint too appealing a topic to investigate!

This thread is as dead a dead thing on dead day.