Can you provide a ' link ' to say that they are not treated differently

Pathetic

Agreed. The claims of discrimination are indeed "pathetic".

I didn't ask for "a link". I asked for evidence.

If any group is being actively (or even passively) treated differently – ie discriminated against – there will be evidence.

I'm sure that you – and/or any of the others who make this claim – can easily find it.

And, since the assertion of discrimination has been made by assorted people, it's up to them to provide evidence of that discrimination (just as, if police claim someone has committed a crime, [ithey[/i need to provide this inconvenient thing known as 'evidence').

No they're not.

Children, children.

Anyway, back to Salford.

Please get rid of McRea, he is a joke.

Oh the irony!

It's only ironic if you tell us which hat you've got on. Wigan or Celtic

Where did you get the picture of Sam Moa from?

It looks nowt like him soft lad

I don't dispute that he's put on weight since that photo was taken, but it is him.

Is that Sam Moa ?

Has there ever been such a fat barsteward in Super League...........

















since Hutch Miava

So you've got the proof, then?

Come on – it can't be that difficult, even for an idiot like you. So provide us with the proof.

Where is the evidence of all this discrimination?

Come on ... cough it up!

You had two spelling mistakes in there. You changed them quickly - you sneak

Meatball must be in need of some attention and a bit of an ego boost to be expending so much energy on 'idiot' bashing. How sweet.

I must jump to the defence of Mintball on this. There have been some fairly outlandish and paranoid statements on here, which, at the end of the day is a discussion forum. People need to read the little book of calm.

Top thread.

This forum exists on outlandish statements, the fact that the moderati feel the need to rise to every bit of bait that comes their way speaks volumes..

Top thread on the best RL message board in the world!

I like the way a moderator can make a thread a sticky warning about personal insults. viewtopic.php?t=391872 but can then refer to a poster as an idiot

I like the way a moderator can make a thread a sticky warning about personal insults. viewtopic.php?t=391872 but can then refer to a poster as an idiot

Quote ="Blackandwhiteviking"I like the way a moderator can make a thread a sticky warning about personal insults. viewtopic.php?t=391872 but can then refer to a poster as an idiot'" Be careful. I got banned for raising a similar question.

Quote ="Blackandwhiteviking"I like the way a moderator can make a thread a sticky warning about personal insults. viewtopic.php?t=391872 but can then refer to a poster as an idiot'" Be careful. I got banned for raising a similar question.

So, what next for the Reds? Taxi for Shaun?

No you didn't.

You got banned for re-editing a post that had been edited by a moderator.

But don't worry – you can be banned again if you want to carry on posting your paranoid lies.

And the continuing lack of evidence from anyone to support their claims of being hard done to has been duly noted.

I suggest that, in future, if any posters wish to claim that they, or any particular group of posters, have been discriminated against, they collate their evidence first.

Then they'll avoid making themselves look like paranoid dolts.