Away you go then

Like I clearly said, no point debating the point/view of how many SL clubs we should have with someone who can't even count how many we currently have

Come along we wait with baited breath

Because you cant / dont have a viable opposite point of view , an old tactic long forgotten and abandoned by most

His point is still a valid one

I quite easily could. Debated with this poster on the 'Sinfield Golden Boot' thread and made him look silly enough times to last a year. He showed there that he has a pre-formed and closed mind opinion of the SL.

*I do like your tactic of accusing me of the thing that you are actually doing.........that's so cute

Well f***ing well DO IT you MORON

We are waiting

Alas you have memory issues. I have yet to see you produce a coherent argument in any thread. I think my views on SL are quite accurate but hey why bother. I watched a terrific match tonight, it was not highly skilled (Tony Smith's words!) but I will not be entertained like that for several games. The players will not be stretched or have to perform high skill levels under pressure so we get beaten v Australia as we have for 50 years BUT hey no doubt you prefer mediocrity as long as the right team wins, beggar the sport.

In what way have these teams benefitted? Let's remember that these are the sort of clubs that would be demoted in this SL2 type idea you're hinting at.

Fylde Warrior's Dictionary
*Benefitting - Have a few years in SL before being dropped back to original level because they couldn't challenge the big boys.

If only we could get our players taking as many drugs as they do















Awwww, now now sunshine, stressful week at work was it? Marital issues? Kids giving you potty?



You are waiting? Sorry, don't jump to your commands. I could debate further but seen as it's wound you up so nicely me not doing it I think i'll hold fire some more



P.S. I await and expect laughable weak-ar$ed response along the lines of "you won't because you can't."

lower tier clubs have, and always will be feeder clubs. Its the same in every sport. Always has been, and always will be.

Let me see stabilising financially (access to KR accounts will show losses went silly in SL not in the Championship, developing players, fans enjoying victories and success.

A little tip for you my trolling friend. You need a little more subtlety, the thinking we had the same number of teams as the NRL, the use of HKR, Salford and Widnes as your examples of clubs being relegated and not suffering, your idea that HKR were sustainable before promotion, its all too obvious.

I wish I was a troll, it would be much easier encountering people who live on the net like yourself.

I will like everybody post something that is incorrect. It will be very occasionally (We did go to 14 when the NRL was 14 clubs did we not

). However, 99% of what I say I believe and it will be correct. I am not here to troll, to wind people up. I leave that to others like yourself.

, these days it is probably much less so , as in truth we are more likely to ' fed ' by the SL clubs due to the wholesale ' hoovering ' up each area's junior talent

This however is a completely different scenario , and yes your proposal is different , but still completely unworkable , and unlikely to happen

Well you did make a half assed attempt at a reply to Fylde Warrior

As for myself , wound up ? , no chance s like you just make me laugh , picking up on minor details shows you up for what you are

Will the same clubs always be feeder clubs? Leigh as an example were the best team in British RL around 81/2. Barrow slightly later had an era when they were a top team. Halifax had a great but brief period under Chris Anderson. Feathertstone won a CC.

You are incapable of debate - in fact you struggle to type a coherent sentence - the idea you have put anyone in their place is simple laughable.

I would suggest RL in UK has had significantly more drugs issues than you see in the NRL.

So now is your chance to show us all this angst you show is not the fact you struggle with penile disfunction, put together an argument that supports your views on the structure of the professional RL

Still wrong. Is it that hard to look things up if you aren't sure? NRL hasn't had 14 teams since, what, 2001? And they really should've had 18 this year.

It may be what you believe but it clearly isnt correct. Maybe if you got your premise and examples correct your conclusions wouldnt be wrong as well?

But you are a troll, so you probably wont.

It isnt the wrong term. It is the correct term. You just dont like it because it goes against your argument. It is right and it is healthy and it is good that players play at a level which correlates with their ability and development. That will mean that the best players will play at the top level, players not quite good enough, or not quite there in their development will play in the leagues below. If they improve to a sufficient level they will move up leagues, if a player loses form or fitness and fall below that level they will drop a level. I dont see why you have a problem with that.

there is nothing unworkable about it. It would be quite easy to administrate and would work. The issue would be convincing the 5/6 clubs who have got it right at the moment to give up the competitive advantage they have earned.

My last post to you as you are clearly what you insult others with re labels. My posts are genuine and bar 1 mistake they are correct. You are the type of person that give internet forums a bad reputation. Respond or not I will not reply.

It isnt one mistake. if you werent a troll you would have gone and checked and realised you made quite a few errors. I even ppointed you toward them. But you didnt, because you were on a wind up and you already knew them to be wrong.

Hunslet try to explain why they are doing what they are doing........... www.hunslethawks.co.uk/news-327- ... ement.html

Hunslet try to explain why they are doing what they are doing........... www.hunslethawks.co.uk/news-327- ... ement.html

We are not Australian or American, we are British. Look at all the major sports in this country. All gobbling up the big sponsorships because people turn up and watch competitive sport. Oh and smokey dear boy ....... Nah i can't be bothered.