You might want to check up on that bud, about half of those were signed before he came but hey don't let facts get in the way of your little rant.

That is priceless. The defence of Agar is that the club signed around around 9 players without any reference to the actual / prospective head coach. What happened? Was Elston running around like a kid in a sweet shop spending 'sugar daddy Glover's money?

Oh dear

She won't, she never does.

Do you think a club signing around 9 players in the absence of the head coach is being well run?

Do you think Agar's record at Hull was indicative of a quality coach?

Like so many wakey posters you need to write about me rather than rugby.

Mr Glover deserves better advice.

Do you think they had any choice ?
Players are available only for a short time and to wait until the new coach was not an option, unless we were to have a further season with basically an "A" team.
The expected loss of our SL licence meant that many players had signed for other teams, therefore the wafer thin squad of last season would have been thinner still.
So, yes, the club is well run and Mr Agar was the best applicant for the job.
Move on and support your own team.

Plenty of choice. For a start you could appoint a new coach much sooner. I assume this did no occur to your CEO




If agar with his dismal record as a head coach was your best applicant then it must have been a dire list.

It would appear that whiever is responsible for signings at wakey there is still a preference for overseas players rather than bring young players through. Shame.

You take this forum lark very seriously dont you. For what it is worth Agar has Trout, Wood, Walshaw and Wildie in the squad for tommorow.

Is this demented old bint still yapping, somebody pull it's chain.

Is Luke George the WBW?

Au contraire. The opposite is true.

You need to look closer to home to find posters who take things seriously and get hot and bothered.

You quite cleary lied about the signings either because you are a bit daft or a bit bitter, either way you claim something thats simply not true but you are not man

enough to admit it.

You can't write about RL unless you understand it and you've proved your lack of knowledge, so i suggest you push some little kid off the swing in the park and let the bigger boys play a big boys game.

No bud what's priceless is your obsession with Trinity and the fact you know absolutely zero about Rugby League, you're out of your depth mate, if you're going to troll and wum, at least show a bit of brains & creativity , otherwise you just get found wanting.

No lies. if i am inaccurate you could explain it rather than resort to your usual lightweight insults

. It is something you apparently need to do. You were one of several wakey posters who started prattling on about me on a wakey thread i had not even commented upon. Oh dear.

Advocating violence against kids is probably all you are good for. Even as an analogy it is a very poor option. stretch your mind a little and come up with something less prurient. HTH

Naa I think your pitiful attempt to defend agar takes the prize. You saying he is not responsible for all the new signings because half were made in his absence is...truely amateur. Given your pea brained defence of agar I will take your further analysis with a large pinch of salt.

But keep digging it amuses me. And if you have evidence that agar can build a long term successful team please do share it

DO NOT FEED

I don't really want to get into a discussion with you, but, there is as little evidence to suggest it wouldn't happen as there is to suggest it would.

Take a look at his record at Hull in one of the best resourced clubs in SL. He had every possible advantage and failed miserably. That is evidence. Do you think any other CEO in SL would have appointed Agar?

Probably not. Do you think any other CEO (like the one at Hull) would stick their nose into the day to day coaching and selection of players as much? What happened at Hull can not be used as evidence as what will happen at Wakefield. The two clubs are massively different in so many way's it's like comparing chalk and cheese.

I agree that it must be tempting for the CEO to tamper when the head coach is so obviously out of his depth.

The issue of CEO's being involved in selction is an interesting one. according to one wakey poster on here Elston made decisions on who to sign for half the newbies



I do not think being the head coach at one SL club is completely unrelated to being head coach at another. But if we accept your point that they are chalk and cheese.....what basis was there for giving Agar the job, other than personal friendship or a 'hunch'?

Someone lock this thread; Cripesginger is the fourth or fifth incanartion of a poster who only ever contributes to stick the boot into WTW in an egregious and usually dishonest way; I think Ted once snubbed her advances and she's never recovered.

Maybe so but i presume the poster was talking about signings made prior to Agar becoming the head coach, not whilst he has been at the club.

Neither you nor i have the right to assume that he was given the job because he's pally with the CEO (which is in fact not entirely true anyway). Why can he not be left for a season or so to prove what his capabilities are at Wakefield? Why do you feel the need to constantly look down your nose and stick the boot into everything concerned with WTWRLFC?

He wont get a hat trick today! Anyway good thread about a good young english player this!

Good thread about a young english lad this! Anyway he wont score a hat ttrick today