Sure, if you give me the drop out and chalk off the try in the following set when it was 18-10 and we were in total control

Wigan fans moaning about getting a raw deal from referees is like Stalin moaning over why he got bad press over introducing gulags

Had we had 13 men, Sneyd may not have had to make that tackle due to one man extra in defence. He certainly wouldn't have been as tired having to defend his line one man down. The short kick off and Shaul knock on wouldn't have mattered.

But you pretend that having a player down in a rugby league match isn't that much of a disadvantage. It just shows you don't really know much about the game.

Match winning? There was loads of time left. Had Hull needed to chase the game, the strategy would most certainly have been different.

It was a knock on anyways. How many no tries do you need to win?! You already got one for the foot on the dead ball line for your second. You nearly got one at the end for a forward pass. If it wasn't for a lucky bounce at the start of the game, you'd have been nilled

Pretty sure you can't take Gildart's try away from us now matter how much you might want to

He was charged and given sending off sufficient. That means it wasn't a wrong decision.

He wasn't charged or cautioned.

By saying sending off sufficient the RFL are basically saying that his punishment has already being served Instead of incorrect on field decision, no case to answer.

How was Houghton not charged for this?

unbelievable. Hull run The RFL!