Honestly when it was GB they were at least winning games against Australia and the kiwis.But hardly never now under England.

I just think the whole England exercise has failed.And the only way for the British to have some sort of recognition again is under the one banner.This is the only way to compete with the powerhouses of RL IMO.And if they don't then will most probably never see England in a Final of a WC or 4 nations and it will be played between Australia and the Kiwis time after time again .At least with GB they have a almighty chance.

engand should revert back to the northern union, thats the last time they were competitive.

how would that work though?

ffs.....


if GB had played in this 4nations it would contain the very same 24 englishmen that england sent!!!



what like last years 4nation final between australia & NZ .......oh hang on that right ENGLAND MADE THE FINAL!!!


jesus....theres some goldfish on here

well of course england made the final, they had an english ref. helping them.

and you lot complain about neutral refs

Ok you made the final whooopi dooooo,when will you ever win one?

explain how being GB would make us more competitive ya pair of clowns...

Well if you combine England Wales Ireland Scotland.That's how.

christ......like i said if we played in this tournament as GB it would still contain the very same 24 englishmen that england sent.....


and the RLi (thats ireland) want nothing to do with GB....so the only player any good to make a GB squad,pat richards,is'nt eligible anyway

Somehow I don't think so.

what you mean you don't think so???...


good answer....i consider that a win for me....wow in 3 posts too...that was easy

We'd get Pat Richards. At least he won't let you down under the bomb, sorry Tom Briscoe but you made England look very amateurish with one mistake.

Cheaky bugger,when I saw your post you didn't have this in your post> and the RLi (thats ireland) want nothing to do with GB....so the only player any good to make a GB squad,pat richards,is'nt eligible anyway


It's only when I Quoted the first Paragraph then I relised you added extra to your post.

christ sake...is everyone thick this morning??


the RLi want nothing to do with Great britain RL...

the RLi want ireland to be a stand alone test nation...

so unless pat ricahrds switched to england he's not eligible to play for GB...

So you agree that it should revert to GB?

i dont know how they dont understand spud!!! it would be the exact same players that are in the current england team but in a different jersey. there are no welsh, scottish and irish players good enough to make the gb team. also, if we did have a gb team in the 4 nations, if there was a welsh player good enough to make it he then would of missed out on playing for wales in the euro cup. what would happen next year, would gb play wales?

the whole idea is absolutely ridiculous!

Wow You won 3 times more then what England will ever win.

you still have'nt answered how being GB would make us more competitive

and for the record the only game in the 2009 4 nations in which england where reffed by a english ref was the game against australia....the french game was reffed by a kiwi,the kiwi game reffed by a frenchmen and the final reffed by a kiwi..


so again your proving yourself absolutely clueless

gareth thomas

First and for most when it was GB you won more games then you were England.Don't you get that?Or you haven't had our cereal yet?


I told you combine 3 nations into one since Ireland don't wanna be a part of it then you'll see a massive difference.

so england did have their own ref against australia.

way,way to early to compare




and i told you that every single man in a GB team would be english...that was the case for the world cup in 2008,last years 4 nations and this years 4nations...


and gareth thomas....

please...lmao

Ok Einstein, you think no Welshman would get picked if it were were reverted back to GB?I bet they pick some this time.

lol...ok then who....