Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"No, in this context, it isn't. The sole question is whether a referee should be independent, or from either of the competing teams. Very clearly a ref who is from the same place as one team cannot be [iseen[/i to be independent, and that's the point. However impartially he might ref the game, it is the appearance of possible bias that is the problem, and the principle is very basic.
Once you grasp that, you can hardly suggest they then say "Yes, obviously we [ishould[/i have a neutral ref, but in this case England is so shh?t, it doesn't matter".
The whole point is to eliminate the perception of [ipotential[/i bias. Most sensible observers would agree that a non-neutral ref would not be likely to show deliberate bias but that's completely beside the point.
And that's ignoring the obvious elephant in the room namely the only reason the ref is NOT neutral is because one team (Australia) has pulled the strings to make it so. Which should have been unthinkable, except it's pretty normal.'"
You must get away with your "holier than thou" routine so often, it becomes second nature
Instead of pontificating on what you consider distinguishes honourable people (English) from dishonourable people (Australian) in Rugby League, how about we deal with the reality instead?
The English want neutral refs about as much as the Aussies do. That is always the reality of the situation. England want one of their own refs in charge and the Aussies want one of their own refs in charge.
Neither camp has ever argued even remotely passionately for neutral referees. Occasionally, both sides will enter a stand off situation and reach a temporary accommodation on the use of neutral refs, but that's about all it ever amounts to. Such temporary accommodations are always terminated at the first mere whiff or hint of an incompetent performance by any neutral ref (Translation: one that isn't English or Australian).
It is therefore not possible to occupy any "high moral ground" when one eagerly and relentlessly participates in such farcical exchanges on who ought to be refereeing international contests.
The England camp wanted their own refs in charge of their fixtures during the 2008 World Cup. Tony Smith whinged and whined relentlessly about not getting a fair go with regard to refereeing appointments. The England camp wanted Bentham in charge of the 2011 Four Nations Final against Australia. They did not want a neutral ref. They lost the refereeing battle and they lost the Final.
Crying "we want neutral refs" immediately after the other mob have succeeded where you have failed is the cry of ts.