Except he didn't actually say that. Biased he sure is, but he didn't say KR had no chance, what he said if they keep Wigan under 20 they have a great chance at winning and he was right, they did have a great chance and kept Wigan under 20 nearly all game.

Notice how much he always bigs Saints up. If you was a newcomer to the sport you'd think he'd played for St Helens. You'll notice from now on.

Tbf to him, at least he knows the rules.

To be fair to Cullen, his punditry style has come on a long way since he started on Sky and I enjoy listening to his comments now.

Phil Clarke. Flying the Wigan flag on Sky Sports since 1999. What a guy. He balances out the anti-Wigan bias from Wire-Wiggy and Uncle Mike from Australia.

Rugby Gods

I don't think that Clarke is actually that biased, he builds his case on statistics and given the statistics Wigan often come out as he best team - it just seems that many others don't like this view and tag him with Wigan tinted glasses.

And then, look at Eddie and Stevo... is there anything that Saint's can do wrong without an excuse?