Very harsh to suggest Kear's vocabulary isn't all it might be. He described Tomkins' play as "sensational" at least 16 times.

Thank you Nick! I absolutely was making a point about the over usage of 'world class'. I used Sam Tomkins as an example yesterday of a player that's in a position of being a potential legend of the game, but we can't truly call him that until he becomes world class and we must judge where he is in the game on that barometer it would seem.

There was not a single ounce of bitterness in my post, I just used him as the example as he was referred to the most against this 'world class' system. In England colours I was fully behind him yesterday and supportive, I think he is the best player on our shores and should have won man of steel, he was also the best player on the park yesterday and I think he already is world class for the record, so those calling me bitter please re-examine my point.

Nope - Warren is negative about virtually everything, from the minute the game starts to the final whistle.

Tomkins is world class. The stuff he does nearly every week moves him into the genius category. He may not have been around long, and nobody suggests he is perfect or anything like that, but he's got skills that are rare, produces them regularly, and as if to prove, produced them against the world's best, despite being in a beaten team.

he might get better, he may become a legend, or he may go to yawnion or get injured and never play again. Neither of the latter will remove the world class talent he has regularly displayed.

Is the use of adjectives within the commentary process really that upsetting? First World problems overload.