Why would a club being 'kicked out' take legal action? Don't laugh, but the RFL insist that the criteria on which the licences applications will be judged is transparent and will be applied to all clubs fairly. Remember, the clubs themselves were consulted on the criteria and agreed the system. If the same sytem when applied last time was okay because it kept certain clubs in, why would it be so wrong as to need those same clubs to resort to legal action when the same system now kicks one of them out? If it was fair and just when it kept Halifax, Leigh and Widnes out, it will surely be just as fair when it lets one of them in (not Leigh) and removes at least one existing club.

would need 80/90 % of that squad changing to be anywhere near competitive in SL

So what exactly are Toulouse achieving in the Championship if becoming competitive in it is of no benifit anyway ?

www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... field.html bump

www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... field.html bump

amen to that

Shouldn't this thread be locked now? We (Wakey) were favourites before the latest cash call. The clubs latest announcement makes us a shoe-in I would say

well if it wasnt for gateshead thunder you wouldnt be here but there you go hopefully the allams buy the kc and you get booted from the kc and have to come begging to us