Why has everyone got such a problem with union. yes a lot of league players are going to union at the moment but that is because of the money and league needs more money in the game.

if there was no rugby union, we wouldnt have the great game of rugby league!

Yes a lot of you will think union is boring and that is all well but i dont know why some of us league fans have such a problem with union.

People have a problem with union as it's a game played by snootie southern folk, who fail to even comprehend that RL is a sport.

Everything about union is 'gash'. Too many fat blokes on 1 pitch, not enough skill - a team can stay in possession for the last 10 mins, just to waste time. I'm proud to say I never watched 1 minute of this years world cup.

The way they tempt the League players to switch codes, for them to play them out of position, and then return to League a couple of years later with shot confidence.

I hate the fact that the RFU obviously look at the Non-English talent in the league game and say "Get your self a union club and we'll have you playing for England." Even though said players have already confirmed their allegiance with their home country.

One of my best Bulls memory was watching them lift the sevens RU cup a few years back - really showed the difference between the athletes at that time. Not 1 team came close to beating the bulls. Even though the bulls never contended a 'mound' on the floor.

its not a game for snootie people because loads of teams up north still play it so u r saying that leeds carnigie fans and rhinos fans are snootie

from the above, how did you make the impression that I think rhinos fans are snooty?

How many grammar schools play league??

2 different sports, it's boring how people make comparisons between the two.

Oh the irony!

I don't hate union, it just disappoints me how much publicity the sport gets compared to ours, when the reality is that League is a far more skillful and entertaining sport. I don't think anyone can argue any differently really.

This sums it up for me...

they are both played different but league is seriously more entertaining and never come across a union fan that can persuade otherwise.

I have watched many of the world cup games as i would still rather watch union than football and it is so frustrating when you see they have a real good opportunity to score if they put the ball through hands but instead some fat git fast walks forward straight into the defence. but suppose when you can get 3 point for drop goals and penalties i can see why they do it.

I think they need to review the scoring drops down to 1 and 2 for penalties likes ours and they might try score more tries!!

thats all well saying which u prefer. and by way im just saying a lot of the rhinos fans are leeds carnigie fans and they arent snooty. u cant say that about every rugby union fan because its not for upper class people and is just a sport.

Yes we would. Before 1895 there was no Rugby Union (in terms of a game - there was an organisation) just Rugby or perhaps Rugby Football.

Rugby Union has no more claim to the games' history pre-1895 than Rugby League.

course it has, there would be no league if there was no union, leage developed different rules to union because they wanted to form and independant code of rugby

The reason is simple. It's all to do with money. There's a lot more of it in Union than there is in League. League is in a catch 22 situation. It needs big money investment in the sport but can't get it because it doesn't get enough media attention and it can't get the media attention it needs without big money investment.

and i bet you think Webb Ellis created the game!

On the same note you could also say if it wasn't for Union there wouldn't have been football



They didn't want to go "independent" they wanted paying for broken time, read the history of the three main professional ball playing sports in this country and you might be surprised!

Correct! This is what most people overlook!

Noooooo! The two sports split apart, one went one way one went the other. Before they split apart it was the same game... Think about it rugby union never turned into rugby league.

It's like evolution, Chimpanzees didn't evolve into humans! They just share a common ancestor.

The Bradford club was formed in 1863 (ignoring the 1907 and 1964 claims) and not 1895.

Before 1895 it played rugby and after 1895 it played rugby. A number of years after 1895, the rugby that Bradford chose to play started to evolve its rules to make it more appealing to spectators. That did not invalidate our pre-1895 history.

The other type of rugby also evolved its rules, but in much smaller ways and essentially remained a players sport, rather than a spectator game.

Watched the RU final today. It was undoubtedly a great occasion but I just found the game totally boring. Would have loved to be able turn over to watch a RL game between Wakefield and Salford.

I just dont understand why they persist with the same basic rules. The scrums last forever and then end up with a penalty. And the last 10mins of the game are a complete anti climax. Endless rucks to wind down the clock until someone can kick the ball into touch. The amount of time spent running or passing the ball is tiny.

Yawnion is the Emperor's New Clothes. The vast majority of people who watch it have no comprehension of the rules. I think most of the players struggle to comprehend them as well. But they are constantly told what a fantastic product it is by some very educated people who mix with the cream of society, supported by their friends in the establishment media. So they confuse grinding immobility with excitment but do not question what is put before them. Try & have a conversation with one of these types, it's impossible, especially if they know you are a league fan. You are not clever enough to appreciate the intricacies of yawnion. A game I played for 5 years.

went to watch rhinos v wakefield on new years day, followed on from carnegie v gloucester, lets just say during the turn around between the games there were plenty of the tweed jacket and polished brogue brigade that couldn't get out of the place quick enough, lest they dare set their eyes on the league game. It was actually quite amusing sitting back and watching them.

Coz it's pants.

Setting aside the years of bigotry, half truths and ignorance (before and after the split in 1895) - even today you only get an oxbridge blue for being named in the starting 13 yet you get one for simply training with the first 15 in Union. I simply find it boring. I suppose it's horses for courses though if you like it good on you. I don't but I also don't like wearing a sweater over my shoulders with the sleaves tied in a knot across my chest.

I'd say that is entirely untrue. Perhaps a handful at best.

If I may chip in? I have tried and tried to get into Union,it just doesn`t work for me,as someone pointed out,the endless rucks,kicking the length of the field to each other,and a bar room brawl.Sorry not for me,but I take nothing away from those who can hack it.

For those who have an interest in how/why the 2 codes diverged, and the circumstances leading up to it, there is no better book than "Rugby's Great Split" by Tony Collins.
The decision to split by some northern clubs was not taken lightly and there are far more complex reasons other than the legendary broken time payments.

The history is interesting and full of what-ifs - particularly how things might have shaped up had the Welsh clubs joined the Northern Union.

As for the game, union produces a lot of quality outside backs (just look at the number of union players we had until the game went professional), and they can put on some great attacking play. However, the game is built around contested possession. That's what allows them to have the endless rucks and mauls, scrums and lineouts. It may be boring, but its what keeps scorelines tight - imagine the All Blacks threequarters vs England at RL, it'd be a massacre.