www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 97,00.html Stanley made unnecessary contact with Brent Webb's face. Any contact made with Brent Webb's face is never unnecessary.

www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 97,00.html Stanley made unnecessary contact with Brent Webb's face. Any contact made with Brent Webb's face is never unnecessary.

It was unnecessary. Far too much unnecessarry messing around when one punch could have done the job.

Perhaps the hearing is to decide on his reward.

No ban. Justice is served! news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 270166.stm Good to see he is still only 35.

No ban. Justice is served! news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 270166.stm Good to see he is still only 35.

Keith Senior deserves life imprisonment. Stanley deserves a medal. Ummm.

No Senior hit Wilkin

That's worth a certificate at least

Wilkin dived like a baby Remi Casty. At least Webb stood up to Stan.

On the subject of Remi Casty, I have a very simple solution for things like that.

If you're going to go down like someone has just shot you in the face with both barrels, then you should actually be shot in the face with both barrels. I reckon that would probably stamp it out.

I like the bit where Stanley stroked Webb's face after Webb had offered to punch him. I thought that was a genuinely nice and caring touch which showed his previous attentions had been misinterpreted.

Jon Wilkin and Remi Casty however are just big jessies and Keith Senior is an old bald bloke with anger management issues. Hope that clears things up

I thought when Stan started licking his lips Webb looked a bit more concerned.

oh dear, not again

Asim made me say it.

It does make one wonder re Graham Bradley, if he was ever on the field at the same time, and tried his usual face bar trick on Stanley, he would not be going to the ref saying look at the teethmarks, but saying look at the mouth shaped piece missing from my forearm!

It's my considered opinion and, I think, fair to say that "yes, indeed" that would probably work . . . . .