Have we got a sell on clause, as he's rumoured to be going to wire for a fee

Given the fact that he is homegrown we could do a lot worse than offer him a contract! Doubt we would be willing to pay silly money for him though, I rate him as a good SL centre but nothing exceptional.

Not that l am aware.....could be wrong though.

IIRC he went for 10k, so an sell on clause may have been added

It is something we have included before (K.Pryce) so I wouldn't be surprised!

Pryce wasn't a sell-on clause if I remember right. It was us holding on to his Rugby League registration, so if he decided to come back to League from Union, we would be entitled to a transfer fee.

The same happened with Larne Patrick too I think when he went down to Aus.

It's all to do with being entitled to fees for young players that you have nurtured, to avoid them being able to just jump ship and you get nothing.

Ah yes so it was..

ryan atkins was told by bradford his services were not required, dont think there will be any fee now.

Atkins wouldn't come back to us, and no, there was nothing of that type -unfortunately- on his leaving terms. Shame really, 20,000 wouldn't be bad as its usually 10%

I don't know what the big deal with Atkins is, he's babba. He's to greedy and not reliable in defence.

Got to agree, never been a fan.