[url=http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sportbulls/sportbullsheadlines/4348191.Bulls_fans_have_reasons_to_be_optimistic/Isn't this what we've been on about.[/url

. . . but not getting paid for it

What's the problem with that?

This website is effectively a source, and he is talking about the Bulls fans.

The reason that your Bulls reporter craven robs stories from here, is because hes a leeds fan and cant help but print cheap stories whereby all the work is done for him by you guys,besides that he actually loathes the club

Steve Mac for the Sack Don't you love him for the cr@p he spouts, clearly a Leeds fan in disguise.

Its he-who-was-the-Punisher on here (and other attempted re-incarnations) as well as previous incarnations on there. Its not a Bulls supporter, but a fifth-column [iagent provocateur[/i - as I think most people realise. Unfortunately, when things were looking really bad a few weeks ago, it managed to temporarily sucker a few - again. But poke it with a sharp stick a few times and it drops the facade and shows its true colors with derision and personal attacks and attempts at bullying.

In my books, Dave Craven is a sub standard journalist.

quite a good journalist is agent craven,apparently his wages are paid by garry hetherington,who has the right to doctor all his posts as he sees fit!

What! They actually have [ijournalists[/i on Sub-Standard now? The contributions on there are rarely good enough to qualify as posts let alone journalism......

'From here', not 'off here'.

Ooer missis, next you`ll be wanting [ifewer[/i penalties instead of less and then fans [istanding[/i on terraces rather than `being stood`.
Chances? A bit slim, I`d guess.

And in that case should it not be stories not storys?